Suppr超能文献

COVID-19:卢旺达、南非和津巴布韦的应对措施比较。

COVID-19: Comparison of the Response in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe.

机构信息

University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Columbia University ICAP Program, Zimbabwe.

出版信息

MEDICC Rev. 2021 Jul-Oct;23(3-4):15-20. doi: 10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.4. Epub 2021 Jul 25.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact worldwide with regions experiencing varying degrees of severity. African countries have mounted different response strategies eliciting varied outcomes. Here, we compare these response strategies in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe and discuss lessons that could be shared. In particular, Rwanda has a robust and coordinated national health system that has effectively contained the epidemic. South Africa has considerable testing capacity, which has been used productively in a national response largely funded by local resources but affected negatively by corruption. Zimbabwe has an effective point-of-entry approach that utilizes an innovative strategic information system. All three countries would benefit having routine meetings to share experiences and lessons learned during the COVD-19 pandemic.

摘要

新冠疫情在全球范围内造成了影响,不同地区的严重程度各有不同。非洲国家采取了不同的应对策略,取得了不同的结果。在此,我们比较了卢旺达、南非和津巴布韦的这些应对策略,并讨论了可以共享的经验教训。特别是,卢旺达拥有强大而协调的国家卫生系统,有效地遏制了疫情。南非拥有相当大的检测能力,这些能力在很大程度上由当地资源资助的国家应对措施中得到了有效利用,但受到腐败的负面影响。津巴布韦采用了有效的入境点方法,利用了创新的战略信息系统。这三个国家都将受益于定期举行会议,分享在新冠疫情期间的经验和教训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验