Koh Benson, Sulaiman Nadiah, Ismadi Sharifah Nursyazwani Shahirah Wan, Ramli Roszalina, Yunus Siti Salmiah Mohd, Idrus Ruszymah Bt Hj, Ariffin Shahrul Hisham Zainal, Wahab Rohaya Megat Abdul, Yazid Muhammad Dain
Centre for Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, 56000, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Biol Proced Online. 2021 Sep 15;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12575-021-00155-7.
In the area of oral and maxillofacial surgery, regenerative endodontics aims to present alternative options to conventional treatment strategies. With continuous advances in regenerative medicine, the source of cells used for pulp tissue regeneration is not only limited to mesenchymal stem cells as the non-mesenchymal stem cells have shown capabilities too. In this review, we are systematically assessing the recent findings on odontoblastic differentiation induction with scaffold and non-scaffold approaches.
A comprehensive search was conducted in Pubmed, and Scopus, and relevant studies published between 2015 and 2020 were selected following the PRISMA guideline. The main inclusion criteria were that articles must be revolving on method for osteoblast differentiation in vitro study. Therefore, in vivo and human or animal clinical studies were excluded. The search outcomes identified all articles containing the word "odontoblast", "differentiation", and "mesenchymal stem cell".
The literature search identified 99 related studies, but only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. These include 5 odontoblastic differentiation induction with scaffold, 6 inductions without scaffolds. The data collected were characterised into two main categories: type of cells undergo odontoblastic differentiation, and odontoblastic differentiation techniques using scaffolds or non-scaffold.
Based on the data analysis, the scaffold-based odontoblastic induction method seems to be a better option compared to the non-scaffold method. In addition of that, the combination of growth factors in scaffold-based methods could possibly enhance the differentiation. Thus, further detailed studies are still required to understand the mechanism and the way to enhance odontoblastic differentiation.
在口腔颌面外科领域,再生牙髓病学旨在为传统治疗策略提供替代方案。随着再生医学的不断进步,用于牙髓组织再生的细胞来源不仅限于间充质干细胞,因为非间充质干细胞也已显示出相关能力。在本综述中,我们系统地评估了支架和无支架方法诱导成牙本质细胞分化的最新研究结果。
在PubMed和Scopus中进行了全面检索,并按照PRISMA指南选择了2015年至2020年间发表的相关研究。主要纳入标准是文章必须围绕体外成骨细胞分化方法展开。因此,排除了体内以及人体或动物临床研究。检索结果确定了所有包含“成牙本质细胞”“分化”和“间充质干细胞”的文章。
文献检索共识别出99项相关研究,但只有11篇文章符合纳入标准。其中包括5项使用支架诱导成牙本质细胞分化的研究,6项无支架诱导研究。收集的数据主要分为两大类:经历成牙本质细胞分化的细胞类型,以及使用支架或无支架的成牙本质细胞分化技术。
基于数据分析,与无支架方法相比,基于支架的成牙本质细胞诱导方法似乎是更好的选择。此外,基于支架的方法中生长因子的组合可能会增强分化。因此,仍需要进一步详细研究以了解其机制以及增强成牙本质细胞分化的方法。