Patel Hirakben Bhagyendrakumar, Desai Nimisha N, Matariya Ridhi G, Makwana Kalpesh G, Movaniya Pratap N
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Jun;11(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_312_20. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
The treatment of subcondylar mandible fractures is a topic of debate and can be variable even though these fractures are commonly seen. The present study aimed at evaluation of various treatment modalities for unilateral condylar fracture in adults.
Thirty patients with unilateral condylar fractures between the age of 18 and 60 years were evaluated. Treatment protocol included closed reduction for 15 patients and open reduction for 15 patients.
Assessment was done functionally for maximum interincisal mouth opening, deviation on maximum interincisal mouth opening, occlusion and facial nerve function, and radiologically for ramus height shortening. In general, there were no statistically significant differences between closed and open methods.
Both the treatment options for condylar fractures of the mandible yielded acceptable results. Closed treatment appears to be a safe and appropriate modality for most unilateral condylar fractures. Although the open group, in general, showed similar outcomes, this treatment should be reserved for limited indications. The present study has confirmed that both treatment options can yield acceptable results. On clinical examination, there was no significant difference in mouth opening measures, the incidence of occlusal disturbances or in the degree of pain perception.
髁突下颌骨骨折的治疗是一个存在争议的话题,尽管这类骨折很常见,但治疗方式可能各不相同。本研究旨在评估成人单侧髁突骨折的各种治疗方式。
对30例年龄在18至60岁之间的单侧髁突骨折患者进行评估。治疗方案包括15例患者采用闭合复位,15例患者采用切开复位。
从功能方面评估最大切牙间开口度、最大切牙间开口时的偏斜、咬合及面神经功能,并从放射学角度评估升支高度缩短情况。总体而言,闭合和切开方法之间无统计学显著差异。
下颌骨髁突骨折的两种治疗选择均取得了可接受的结果。对于大多数单侧髁突骨折,闭合治疗似乎是一种安全且合适的方式。虽然切开治疗组总体上显示出相似的结果,但这种治疗应仅用于有限的适应证。本研究证实,两种治疗选择均可取得可接受的结果。临床检查发现,开口度测量、咬合紊乱发生率或疼痛感知程度方面无显著差异。