Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎中使用甲氨蝶呤或肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的关节内治疗:一项系统评价

Intra-articular therapy with methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

作者信息

Sullivan Megan M, Pham Michael M, Marks Lisa A, Aslam Fawad

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 15;22(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04651-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persistent monoarthritis in otherwise well-controlled rheumatoid arthritis presents a therapeutic challenge. Intra-articular (IA) steroids are a mainstay of treatment, though some have queried whether IA disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) and biologics can be used in those who fail steroid injections.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using four medical databases to identify randomized, controlled trials assessing IA therapies in RA patients. Included studies underwent Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 assessment for quality.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, 6 of which examined intra-articular (IA) TNF inhibitors (TNFi), and 6 studies evaluating IA methotrexate. Of those evaluating IA TNFi, one study reported statistical improvement in TNFi therapy when compared with placebo. The remaining 5 studies compared IA TNFi therapy with steroid injections. IA TNFi had statistically improved symptom scores and clinical assessments comparable with IA steroid treatments. In the 6 studies evaluating IA methotrexate, the addition of methotrexate to steroid intra-articular therapy was not found to be beneficial, and singular methotrexate injection was not superior to the control arms (saline or triamcinolone). Risk-of-bias (ROB) assessment with the Revised Cochrane ROB tool indicated that 2 of 6 TNFi studies were at some risk or high risk for bias, compared with 5 out of 6 methotrexate studies.

CONCLUSION

For persistent monoarthritis in rheumatoid arthritis, IA methotrexate was not found to have clinical utility. Intra-articular TNFi therapy appears to have equal efficacy to IA steroids, though the optimal dose and frequency of injections is yet unknown.

摘要

背景

在其他方面控制良好的类风湿关节炎中,持续性单关节炎带来了治疗挑战。关节内(IA)注射类固醇是主要治疗方法,不过有人质疑IA疾病改善抗风湿药物(DMARD)和生物制剂是否可用于类固醇注射治疗失败的患者。

方法

使用四个医学数据库进行系统文献综述,以识别评估类风湿关节炎患者IA治疗的随机对照试验。纳入的研究接受Cochrane偏倚风险2评估以确定质量。

结果

纳入了12项研究,其中6项研究检查了关节内(IA)肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi),6项研究评估了IA甲氨蝶呤。在评估IA TNFi的研究中,一项研究报告与安慰剂相比,TNFi治疗有统计学上的改善。其余5项研究将IA TNFi治疗与类固醇注射进行了比较。IA TNFi在症状评分和临床评估方面有统计学上的改善,与IA类固醇治疗相当。在评估IA甲氨蝶呤的6项研究中,未发现将甲氨蝶呤添加到关节内类固醇治疗中有益处,单次甲氨蝶呤注射也不优于对照组(生理盐水或曲安奈德)。使用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行的偏倚风险(ROB)评估表明,6项TNFi研究中有2项存在一定偏倚风险或高偏倚风险,而6项甲氨蝶呤研究中有5项存在偏倚风险。

结论

对于类风湿关节炎中的持续性单关节炎,未发现IA甲氨蝶呤具有临床实用性。关节内TNFi治疗似乎与IA类固醇具有同等疗效,不过最佳注射剂量和频率尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd2/8444402/1d5243843c1a/12891_2021_4651_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验