Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Sep;51(5):42-47. doi: 10.1002/hast.1285.
The September-October 2021 issue of the Hastings Center Report highlights the important topic of allocating scarce critical care resources during the Covid-19 pandemic. The article by Alex Rajczi and colleagues urges that policy-makers use public reasoning, not private reasoning, when developing triage policies. We completely agree. We show how the allocation framework we developed as private scholars, the "Pittsburgh framework," has been supported by public reasoning. The article by MaryKatherine Gaurke and colleagues criticizes rationing based on maximizing life-years saved and mistakenly claims that our framework recommended this approach. We explain that our framework never contained such a criterion but instead included a more limited consideration of near-term prognosis. In December 2020, in response to emerging data and important criticisms, we modified our framework to further strengthen equity. We are committed to improving allocation guidelines during crisis standards of care through reflective discussions and debates.
2021 年 9-10 月的《黑斯廷斯中心报告》重点探讨了在新冠疫情期间分配稀缺重症监护资源这一重要议题。Alex Rajczi 及其同事的文章敦促政策制定者在制定分诊政策时使用公共推理,而不是私人推理。我们完全同意这一观点。我们展示了作为私人学者开发的分配框架——“匹兹堡框架”如何通过公共推理得到支持。MaryKatherine Gaurke 及其同事的文章批评了基于最大化挽救生命年数的配给,并错误地声称我们的框架推荐了这种方法。我们解释说,我们的框架从未包含这样的标准,而是包含了对近期预后的更有限的考虑。2020 年 12 月,针对新出现的数据和重要批评,我们修改了我们的框架,以进一步加强公平性。我们致力于通过反思性讨论和辩论,在危机标准护理期间改进分配指南。