Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Prog Orthod. 2021 Sep 20;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00379-z.
To evaluate morphologic differences between class III malocclusion success and failure treatment subjects in order to identify which variables are more predictive for long-term stability in early orthopedic treatment. In this retrospective study, 31 patients were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics (Rome Tor Vergata). Inclusion criteria were as follows: white ancestry, class III malocclusion, mixed dentition, cervical stage (CS) 1-2, no pseudo-class III. Pre-treatment radiographic and cast records were collected. Each patient underwent rapid maxillary expansion/facial mask/bite block (RME/FM/BB) orthopedic treatment until correction. At T1 (permanent dentition, CS4), records were recollected. According to treatment stability, relapse group (RG, 19) and success group (SG, 12) were identified. Sagittal and vertical cephalometric and digital cast measurements were performed. Student's t tests were used for statistically significant differences inter and intra groups. For discriminant analysis, relapse or success status was added to each patient's T0 data.
At T0, RG showed larger upper anterior transversal width (p = 0.0266), while at T1 the upper anterior length was shorter than SG (p = 0.0028). Between T1 and T0, both groups showed larger upper anterior and posterior transversal widths. SG had greater upper anterior (p = 0.0066) and posterior (p = 0.449) sagittal length. RG presented larger lower anterior (p = 0.0012) and posterior (p = 0.0002) transversal widths, while there were no differences in SG lower arch. Discriminant analysis provided two predictive variables with an accuracy of 80.6%: upper anterior length and upper posterior length.
A shorter and wider maxilla could be a predisposing factor for relapse and failure of the early orthopedic treatment of class III malocclusion patients. The absence of mandibular changes could be predictable for treatment success.
评估 III 类错颌畸形治疗成功与失败患者的形态差异,以确定哪些变量对早期正畸治疗的长期稳定性更具预测性。在这项回顾性研究中,从正畸科(罗马 Tor Vergata)招募了 31 名患者。纳入标准如下:白种人血统、III 类错颌、混合牙列、颈椎阶段(CS)1-2、无假性 III 类错颌。收集了每位患者的治疗前影像学和石膏模型记录。所有患者均接受快速上颌扩张/面部面罩/咬合块(RME/FM/BB)正畸治疗,直至矫正。在 T1(恒牙列,CS4)时,再次收集记录。根据治疗稳定性,确定复发组(RG,19 例)和成功组(SG,12 例)。进行了矢状和垂直头颅侧位和数字石膏模型测量。使用 Student's t 检验进行组间和组内的统计学差异。对于判别分析,将复发或成功状态添加到每位患者的 T0 数据中。
在 T0 时,RG 的上前牙横向宽度较大(p = 0.0266),而在 T1 时,上切牙长度比 SG 短(p = 0.0028)。在 T1 和 T0 之间,两组上前牙和后牙的横向宽度均增加。SG 的上前牙(p = 0.0066)和后牙(p = 0.449)矢状长度更大。RG 的下前牙(p = 0.0012)和后牙(p = 0.0002)的横向宽度更大,而 SG 的下颌弓无差异。判别分析提供了两个具有 80.6%准确性的预测变量:上切牙长度和上后牙长度。
上颌较短且较宽可能是 III 类错颌早期正畸治疗复发和失败的一个易感因素。下颌无变化可能是治疗成功的预测因素。