School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science (BEES), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geoscience, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Environmental Sustainability and Health Institute (ESIH), Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Sep;238:113840. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113840. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Extreme Weather Events (EWEs) impose a substantial health and socio-economic burden on exposed populations. Projected impacts on public health, based on increasing EWE frequencies since the 1950s, alongside evidence of human-mediated climatic change represents a growing concern. To date, the impacts of EWEs on mental health remain ambiguous, largely due to the inherent complexities in linking extreme weather phenomena with psychological status. This exploratory investigation provides a new empirical and global perspective on the psychological toll of EWEs by exclusively focusing on psychological morbidity among individuals exposed to such events. Morbidity data collated from a range of existing psychological and well-being measures have been integrated to develop a single ("holistic") metric, namely, psychological impairment. Morbidity, and impairment, were subsequently pooled for key disorders-, specifically PTSD, anxiety and depression. A "composite" (any impairment) post-exposure pooled-prevalence rate of 23% was estimated, with values of 24% calculated for depression and ⁓17% for both PTSD and anxiety. Notably, calculated pooled odds ratios (pOR = 1.9) indicate a high likelihood of any negative psychological outcome (+90%) following EWE exposure. Pooled analyses of reported risk factors (p < 0.05) highlight the pronounced impacts of EWEs among individuals with higher levels of event exposure or experienced stressors (14.5%) and socio-demographic traits traditionally linked to vulnerable sub-populations, including female gender (10%), previous history (i.e., pre-event) of psychological impairment (5.5%), lower socio-economic status (5.5%), and a lower education level (5.2%). Inherent limitations associated with collating mental health data from populations exposed to EWEs, and key knowledge gaps in the field are highlighted. Study findings provide a robust evidence base for developing and implementing public health intervention strategies aimed at ameliorating the psychological impacts of extreme weather among exposed populations.
极端天气事件(EWEs)给暴露人群的健康和社会经济带来了巨大负担。自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,EWEs 频率的增加以及人为引起的气候变化的证据表明,对公共卫生的预计影响越来越令人担忧。迄今为止,EWEs 对心理健康的影响仍不明确,这主要是由于将极端天气现象与心理状况联系起来的固有复杂性。本探索性研究通过专门关注暴露于此类事件的个体的心理病态,为 EWEs 的心理影响提供了新的实证和全球视角。从一系列现有的心理和幸福感测量中收集的病态数据已被整合到一个单一的(“整体”)指标中,即心理障碍。随后,对关键疾病(即创伤后应激障碍、焦虑和抑郁)的病态和障碍进行了汇总。估计了暴露后“综合”(任何障碍)的 pooled-prevalence 率为 23%,计算出的抑郁值为 24%,创伤后应激障碍和焦虑值均为 ⁓17%。值得注意的是,计算出的 pooled 比值比(pOR=1.9)表明,在 EWE 暴露后,任何负面心理结果的可能性都很高(增加 90%)。对报告的风险因素的 pooled 分析(p<0.05)突出了 EWEs 对暴露于更高水平的事件或经历压力源的个体(14.5%)以及传统上与脆弱亚人群相关的社会人口特征的明显影响,包括女性性别(10%)、之前的心理障碍(即事件前)史(5.5%)、较低的社会经济地位(5.5%)和较低的教育水平(5.2%)。从暴露于 EWEs 的人群中收集心理健康数据所固有的局限性以及该领域的主要知识空白被突出强调。研究结果为制定和实施旨在减轻暴露人群中极端天气对心理影响的公共卫生干预策略提供了有力的证据基础。