University of Oklahoma, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.
Blood Adv. 2022 Jan 11;6(1):339-357. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004916.
The role of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is being defined. We performed a retrospective, multivariable analysis comparing outcomes of HCT approaches by donor for adults with ALL in remission. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) among haploidentical HCTs using PTCy and HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD), 7 /8 HLA-MUD, or umbilical cord blood (UCB) HCT. Comparing haploidentical HCT to MSD HCT, we found that OS, leukemia-free survival (LFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were not different but chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was higher in MSD HCT. Compared with MUD HCT, OS, LFS, and relapse were not different, but MUD HCT had increased NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; P = .02), grade 3 to 4 aGVHD (HR, 1.59; P = .005), and cGVHD. Compared with 7/8 UD HCT, LFS and relapse were not different, but 7/8 UD HCT had worse OS (HR, 1.38; P = .01) and increased NRM (HR, 2.13; P ≤ .001), grade 3 to 4 aGVHD (HR, 1.86; P = .003), and cGVHD (HR, 1.72; P ≤ .001). Compared with UCB HCT, late OS, late LFS, relapse, and cGVHD were not different but UCB HCT had worse early OS (≤18 months; HR, 1.93; P < .001), worse early LFS (HR, 1.40; P = .007) and increased incidences of NRM (HR, 2.08; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 aGVHD (HR, 1.97; P < .001). Haploidentical HCT using PTCy showed no difference in survival but less GVHD compared with traditional MSD and MUD HCT and is the preferred alternative donor HCT option for adults with ALL in complete remission.
使用 posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) 的单倍体造血细胞移植 (HCT) 在急性淋巴细胞白血病 (ALL) 中的作用正在被定义。我们进行了一项回顾性多变量分析,比较了缓解期成人 ALL 接受不同供者来源的 HCT 方法的结果。主要目的是比较单倍体 HCT 中使用 PTCy 与 HLA 匹配的同胞供者 (MSD)、8/8 HLA 匹配的无关供者 (MUD)、7/8 HLA-MUD 或脐带血 (UCB) HCT 的总生存率 (OS)。与 MSD HCT 相比,我们发现单倍体 HCT 的 OS、无白血病生存 (LFS)、非复发死亡率 (NRM)、复发和急性移植物抗宿主病 (aGVHD) 没有差异,但慢性移植物抗宿主病 (cGVHD) 在 MSD HCT 中更高。与 MUD HCT 相比,OS、LFS 和复发没有差异,但 MUD HCT 的 NRM 更高 (风险比 [HR],1.42;P =.02)、3 至 4 级 aGVHD (HR,1.59;P =.005) 和 cGVHD。与 7/8 UD HCT 相比,LFS 和复发没有差异,但 7/8 UD HCT 的 OS 更差 (HR,1.38;P =.01),NRM 更高 (HR,2.13;P ≤.001)、3 至 4 级 aGVHD (HR,1.86;P =.003) 和 cGVHD (HR,1.72;P ≤.001)。与 UCB HCT 相比,晚期 OS、晚期 LFS、复发和 cGVHD 没有差异,但 UCB HCT 的早期 OS 更差 (≤18 个月;HR,1.93;P <.001)、早期 LFS 更差 (HR,1.40;P =.007) 和 NRM 发生率更高 (HR,2.08;P <.001) 和 3 至 4 级 aGVHD (HR,1.97;P <.001)。使用 PTCy 的单倍体 HCT 在生存方面与传统的 MSD 和 MUD HCT 没有差异,但 GVHD 较少,是缓解期成人 ALL 的首选替代供者 HCT 选择。