Carnino Luisa, Schwob Jean-Marc, Neofytos Dionysios, Lazo-Porras Maria, Chappuis François, Eperon Gilles
Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 6, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 21;6(3):170. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6030170.
Reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or latent parasitic infection (LPI) during drug-induced immunosuppression can have serious consequences. The Division of tropical and humanitarian medicine of the Geneva University Hospitals runs a specific consultation for parasitic screening of immunosuppressed or pre-immunosuppressed patients. We sought to determine the seroprevalence of LTBI and LPI in such patients and explore its relationship with country of origin or previous travel in a retrospective, single-centre observational study from 2016 to 2019. Demographic data, travel history, ongoing treatments and results of the parasitological (, , , and spp.) and TB screening were collected to calculate LPI or LTBI prevalence. Risk factors for LTBI and strongyloidiasis were analysed using Poisson regression with robust variance. Among 406 eligible patients, 24/353 (6.8%) had LTBI, 8/368 (2.2%) were positive for infection, 1/32 (3.1%) was positive for and 1/299 (0.3%) was positive for Leishmaniasis. No cases of (0/274) or (0/56) infection were detected. Previous travel to or originating from high-prevalence countries was a risk factor for LTBI (PR = 3.4, CI 95%: 1.4-8.2 and 4.0, CI 95%: 1.8-8.9, respectively). The prevalence of serological Strongyloidiasis in immunosuppressed patients is lower in comparison to those without immunosuppression (PR = 0.1, CI 95%: 0.01-0.8). In conclusion, screening before immunosuppression needs to be individualized, and LTBI and LPI need to be ruled out in patients who originate from or have travelled to high-prevalence countries. The sensitivity of strongyloidiasis serology is reduced following immunosuppression, so an algorithm combining different tests or presumptive treatment should be considered.
药物诱导的免疫抑制期间,潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)或潜伏性寄生虫感染(LPI)的重新激活可能会产生严重后果。日内瓦大学医院热带与人道主义医学科针对免疫抑制或预免疫抑制患者开展了寄生虫筛查专项咨询。在一项2016年至2019年的回顾性单中心观察性研究中,我们试图确定此类患者中LTBI和LPI的血清阳性率,并探讨其与原籍国或既往旅行史的关系。收集人口统计学数据、旅行史、正在进行的治疗以及寄生虫学(粪类圆线虫、溶组织内阿米巴、蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫和利什曼原虫属)和结核病筛查结果,以计算LPI或LTBI患病率。使用稳健方差的泊松回归分析LTBI和类圆线虫病的危险因素。在406名符合条件的患者中,24/353(6.8%)患有LTBI,8/368(2.2%)粪类圆线虫感染呈阳性,1/32(3.1%)溶组织内阿米巴呈阳性,1/299(0.3%)利什曼病呈阳性。未检测到蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫(0/274)或疟原虫(0/56)感染病例。既往前往高流行国家旅行或来自高流行国家是LTBI的危险因素(PR = 3.4,95%CI:1.4 - 8.2和4.0,95%CI:1.8 - 8.9)。与未免疫抑制的患者相比,免疫抑制患者血清学类圆线虫病的患病率较低(PR = 0.1,95%CI:0.01 - 0.8)。总之,免疫抑制前的筛查需要个体化,对于来自高流行国家或有前往高流行国家旅行史的患者,需要排除LTBI和LPI。免疫抑制后类圆线虫病血清学的敏感性降低,因此应考虑采用结合不同检测方法或推定治疗的算法。