Sampogna Gaia, Del Vecchio Valeria, Giallonardo Vincenzo, Luciano Mario, Albert Umberto, Carmassi Claudia, Carrà Giuseppe, Cirulli Francesca, Dell'Osso Bernardo, Menculini Giulia, Nanni Mariagiulia, Pompili Maurizio, Sani Gabriele, Volpe Umberto, Bianchini Valeria, Fiorillo Andrea
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34128 Trieste, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 17;11(9):1231. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091231.
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health are now well documented, however, few studies have been focused on the role of coping strategies and resilience in counterbalancing these detrimental effects. Data are derived from the COvid Mental hEalth Trial (COMET), a national multicentric trial carried out in the Italian general population. The final sample consisted of 20,720 participants, 53.1% ( = 11,000) of the sample reported low levels of resilience. Adaptive coping strategies and resilience levels did not have any significant protective impact on the levels of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Only self-distraction was a risk factor for poor mental health (Beta Coefficient, B = 0.1, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.003 to 0.267 for stress symptoms; B = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.077 to 0.324 for anxiety symptoms and B = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.105 to 0.382 for depressive symptoms). High levels of resilience were predicted by adaptive coping strategies, such as acceptance (B = 1.8, CI 95% = 1.4-2.7). Exposure to the different weeks of lockdown, being infected by COVID-19, and being a healthcare professional did not influence the levels of resilience. Our findings should be carefully considered, since the low levels of resilience may represent the missing link between the pandemic and the current increase in mental health problems.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对心理健康的影响现已得到充分记录,然而,很少有研究关注应对策略和心理韧性在抵消这些有害影响方面的作用。数据来自“新冠心理健康试验”(COMET),这是一项在意大利普通人群中开展的全国多中心试验。最终样本包括20720名参与者,其中53.1%(n = 11000)的样本报告心理韧性水平较低。适应性应对策略和心理韧性水平对抑郁、焦虑和压力症状水平没有显著的保护作用。只有自我分散注意力是心理健康不佳的一个风险因素(压力症状的β系数,B = 0.1,95%置信区间,CI:0.003至0.267;焦虑症状的B = 0.2;95%CI:0.077至0.324;抑郁症状的B = 0.2,95%CI:0.105至0.382)。适应性应对策略,如接纳(B = 1.8,CI 95% = 1.4 - 2.7)可预测较高的心理韧性水平。经历不同周数的封锁、感染COVID-19以及身为医护人员均未影响心理韧性水平。我们的研究结果应得到认真考虑,因为心理韧性水平较低可能是大流行与当前心理健康问题增加之间缺失的环节。