Communicable Disease Control Department, Preventive sector, Ministry of Health and Population, Cairo, Egypt.
Community and Family Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Dec 8;43(Suppl 3):iii1-iii11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab240.
This study aimed to compare knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) regarding COVID-19 between public health workers (PHWs) attended field epidemiology training program (FETP-trained) and those who did not attend FETP (non-FETP trained).
Multi-country cross-sectional survey was conducted among PHWs who participated in COVID-19 pandemic in 10 countries at EMR. Online questionnaire that included demographic information, KAP regarding COVID-19 pandemic was distributed among HCWs. Scoring system was used to quantify the answers, bivariate and Multivariate analysis performed to compare FETP-trained with non-FETP trained PHWs.
Overall, 1337 PHWs participated, with 835 (62.4%) < 40 years of age, and 851 (63.6%) males. Of them, 423 (31.6%) had FETP, including that 189 (44.7%) had advanced level, 155 (36.6%) intermediate and 79 (18.7%) basic level training. Compared with non-FETP trained, FETP trained were older, having higher KAP scores. FETP participation was low in infection control, and PH laboratories. KAP mean scores for intermediate level attendees are comparable to advanced level.
FETP-trained are having better KAP than non-FETP PHWs. Expanding the intermediate level, maintain the Rapid Response training and introduce the laboratory component are recommended to maximize the benefit from FETP. Infection control, antimicrobial resistance and coordination are areas where training should include.
本研究旨在比较参加现场流行病学培训项目(FETP 培训)和未参加 FETP 培训的公共卫生工作者(PHW)对 COVID-19 的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。
在 EMR 参与 COVID-19 大流行的 PHW 中进行了多国横断面调查。向 HCW 分发了包括人口统计学信息、COVID-19 大流行 KAP 的在线问卷。使用评分系统量化答案,进行单变量和多变量分析,以比较 FETP 培训和非 FETP 培训的 PHW。
共有 1337 名 PHW 参与,其中 835 名(62.4%)<40 岁,851 名(63.6%)为男性。其中,423 名(31.6%)有 FETP,包括 189 名(44.7%)高级水平、155 名(36.6%)中级水平和 79 名(18.7%)基础水平培训。与非 FETP 培训相比,FETP 培训的年龄更大,KAP 评分更高。FETP 在感染控制和 PH 实验室中的参与度较低。中级水平参与者的 KAP 平均得分与高级水平相当。
FETP 培训的 PHW 比非 FETP PHW 具有更好的 KAP。建议扩大中级培训、保持快速反应培训和引入实验室部分,以最大限度地从 FETP 中受益。感染控制、抗微生物耐药性和协调是培训应包括的领域。