Suppr超能文献

指导早期乳腺癌、结直肠癌和弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤化疗前血液检查最佳时机的证据。

Evidence to guide the optimal timing for pre-chemotherapy blood tests for early breast, colorectal cancer and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

机构信息

UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

UCLH-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, London, UK.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(22):7996-8004. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4316. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Re-designing services and processes to meet growing demands in chemotherapy services is necessary with increasing treatments. There is little evidence guiding the timing and thresholds to be attained of pre-chemotherapy blood assessments, namely neutrophils.

METHODS

A survey was developed and distributed to health professionals in the United Kingdom (UK) to examine current practice in timing and threshold values of neutrophils and platelets before treatment administration. This was followed by a retrospective cohort study, using data from electronic patient record systems; including patients initiating treatment between January 2013 and December 2018, to determine a safe timeframe for blood assessments; comparing neutrophil, platelet, creatinine and bilirubin levels at different time points.

RESULTS

The survey captured 25% of hospitals in the UK and variations were apparent in both the timing of assessments and thresholds needed, particularly for neutrophils. 616 (6.5%) of 4007 patients included had neutrophil levels measured twice within 7 days of treatment (with the first level taken beyond 3 days and the second test being within 3 days of treatment- the UK standard). Of the patients that attained an acceptable neutrophil level at their first test, five of the 616 (0.8%) became ineligible for administration from the test 2 level. 23% of patients improved their grade and became eligible for treatment. Little difference was observed for platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that extending the timeframe for blood tests can be safe, however, this practice may cause unnecessary delays for patients if only an early test is relied on for eligibility.

摘要

背景

随着治疗的增加,有必要重新设计化疗服务和流程,以满足不断增长的需求。几乎没有证据指导化疗前血液评估(即中性粒细胞)的时间和达到的阈值。

方法

我们开发了一项调查,并分发给英国的卫生专业人员,以检查在治疗前管理中进行中性粒细胞和血小板的时间和阈值值的当前实践。随后,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用电子患者记录系统中的数据;包括在 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间开始治疗的患者,以确定血液评估的安全时间范围;比较不同时间点的中性粒细胞、血小板、肌酐和胆红素水平。

结果

该调查涵盖了英国 25%的医院,评估时间和所需阈值存在明显差异,特别是中性粒细胞。在 4007 名患者中有 616 名(6.5%)在治疗前 7 天内进行了两次中性粒细胞水平测量(第一次测量时间超过 3 天,第二次测量时间在治疗前 3 天内-英国标准)。在首次检查中达到可接受中性粒细胞水平的患者中,有 616 名患者中的 5 名(0.8%)由于第二次检查的中性粒细胞水平而不合格。23%的患者改善了他们的等级并获得了治疗资格。血小板的差异很小。

结论

我们已经证明,延长血液检查的时间范围是安全的,但是,如果仅依赖早期检查来确定资格,这可能会给患者带来不必要的延误。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8607255/91f743adcf6d/CAM4-10-7996-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验