Hussein Mohamed, Sehgal Vinay, Sami Sarmed, Bassett Paul, Sweis Rami, Graham David, Telese Andrea, Morris Danielle, Rodriguez-Justo Manuel, Jansen Marnix, Novelli Marco, Banks Matthew, Lovat Laurence B, Haidry Rehan
Division of surgery and interventional science University College London (UCL) London UK.
Department of Gastroenterology University College London Hospital London UK.
JGH Open. 2021 Aug 6;5(9):1019-1025. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12625. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Barrett's esophagus is associated with increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The optimal management of low-grade dysplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. We performed a retrospective study from a tertiary referral center for Barrett's esophagus neoplasia, to estimate time to progression to high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with confirmed low-grade dysplasia compared with those with downstaged low-grade dysplasia from index presentation and referral. We analyzed risk factors for progression.
We analyzed consecutive patients with low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus referred to a single tertiary center (July 2006-October 2018). Biopsies were reviewed by at least two expert pathologists.
One hundred and forty-seven patients referred with suspected low-grade dysplasia were included. Forty-two of 133 (32%) of all external referrals had confirmed low-grade dysplasia after expert histopathology review. Multivariable analysis showed nodularity at index endoscopy ( < 0.05), location of dysplasia ( = 0.05), and endoscopic therapy after referral ( = 0.09) were associated with progression risk. At 5 years, 59% of patients with confirmed low-grade dysplasia had not progressed 74% of patients in the cohort downstaged to non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.
Our data show variability in the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia. The cumulative incidence of progression and time to progression varied across subgroups. Confirmed low-grade dysplasia had a shorter progression time compared with the downstaged group. Nodularity at index endoscopy and multifocal low-grade dysplasia were significant risk factors for progression. It is important to differentiate these high-risk subgroups so that decisions on surveillance/endotherapy can be personalized.
巴雷特食管与食管腺癌风险增加相关。巴雷特食管中出现的低度异型增生的最佳管理方案仍存在争议。我们从一家巴雷特食管肿瘤的三级转诊中心进行了一项回顾性研究,以估计确诊为低度异型增生的患者与初次就诊和转诊时降级为低度异型增生的患者进展为高度异型增生/食管腺癌的时间。我们分析了进展的危险因素。
我们分析了2006年7月至2018年10月转诊至单一三级中心的巴雷特食管低度异型增生的连续患者。活检由至少两名专家病理学家进行复查。
纳入了147例疑似低度异型增生转诊患者。在所有外部转诊的133例患者中,42例(32%)经专家组织病理学复查确诊为低度异型增生。多变量分析显示,初次内镜检查时的结节性(<0.05)、异型增生部位(=0.05)和转诊后的内镜治疗(=0.09)与进展风险相关。5年后,确诊为低度异型增生的患者中有59%未进展,队列中降级为无异型增生的巴雷特食管的患者中有74%未进展。
我们的数据显示低度异型增生的诊断存在差异。各亚组的进展累积发生率和进展时间各不相同。与降级组相比,确诊为低度异型增生的患者进展时间较短。初次内镜检查时的结节性和多灶性低度异型增生是进展的重要危险因素。区分这些高危亚组很重要,以便能够对监测/内镜治疗决策进行个性化。