Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Malaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 29;9(9):CD008846. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008846.pub3.
Studies evaluating mass drug administration (MDA) in malarious areas have shown reductions in malaria immediately following the intervention. However, these effects vary by endemicity and are not sustained. Since the 2013 version of this Cochrane Review on this topic, additional studies have been published.
Primary objectives To assess the sustained effect of MDA with antimalarial drugs on: - the reduction in malaria transmission in moderate- to high-transmission settings; - the interruption of transmission in very low- to low-transmission settings. Secondary objective To summarize the risk of drug-associated adverse effects following MDA.
We searched several trial registries, citation databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists for relevant articles up to 11 February 2021. We also communicated with researchers to identify additional published and unpublished studies.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies comparing MDA to no MDA with balanced co-interventions across study arms and at least two geographically distinct sites per study arm.
Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and extracted data. We calculated relative risk (RR) and rate ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare prevalence and incidence, respectively, in MDA compared to no-MDA groups. We stratified analyses by malaria transmission and by malaria species. For cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs), we adjusted standard errors using the intracluster correlation coefficient. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. For non-randomized controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies, we summarized the data using difference-in-differences (DiD) analyses.
Thirteen studies met our criteria for inclusion. Ten were cRCTs and three were CBAs. Cluster-randomized controlled trials Moderate- to high-endemicity areas (prevalence ≥ 10%) We included data from two studies conducted in The Gambia and Zambia. At one to three months after MDA, the Plasmodium falciparum (hereafter, P falciparum) parasitaemia prevalence estimates may be higher compared to control but the CIs included no effect (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.58 to 5.36; Zambia study; low-certainty evidence); parasitaemia incidence was probably lower (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.92; The Gambia study; moderate-certainty evidence); and confirmed malaria illness incidence may be substantially lower, but the CIs included no effect (rate ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.42; Zambia study; low-certainty evidence). At four to six months after MDA, MDA showed little or no effect on P falciparum parasitaemia prevalence (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.56; The Gambia study; moderate-certainty evidence) and, no persisting effect was demonstrated with parasitaemia incidence (rate ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.50; The Gambia study). Very low- to low-endemicity areas (prevalence < 10%) Seven studies from Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (two studies), Vietnam, Zambia, and Zanzibar evaluated the effects of multiple rounds of MDA on P falciparum. Immediately following MDA (less than one month after MDA), parasitaemia prevalence was reduced (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.52; one study; low-certainty evidence). At one to three months after MDA, there was a reduction in both parasitaemia incidence (rate ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence) and prevalence (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.41; 7 studies; low-certainty evidence). For confirmed malaria incidence, absolute rates were low, and it is uncertain whether MDA had an effect on this outcome (rate ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.73; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). For P falciparum prevalence, the relative differences declined over time, from RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.12; 4 studies) at four to six months after MDA, to RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.36; 5 studies) at 7 to 12 months after MDA. Longer-term prevalence estimates showed overall low absolute risks, and relative effect estimates of the effect of MDA on prevalence varied from RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.20 to 3.34) at 13 to 18 months after MDA, to RR 1.25 (95% CI 0.25 to 6.31) at 31 to 36 months after MDA in one study. Five studies from Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (2 studies), and Vietnam evaluated the effect of MDA on Plasmodium vivax (hereafter, P vivax). One month following MDA, P vivax prevalence was lower (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.40; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). At one to three months after MDA, there was a reduction in P vivax prevalence (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.24; 5 studies; low-certainty evidence). The immediate reduction on P vivax prevalence was not sustained over time, from RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.95; 4 studies) at four to six months after MDA, to RR 1.12 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.32; 5 studies) at 7 to 12 months after MDA. One of the studies in Myanmar provided estimates of longer-term effects, where overall absolute risks were low, ranging from RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.48) at 13 to 18 months after MDA, to RR 1.20 (95% CI 0.44 to 3.29) at 31 to 36 months after MDA. Non-randomized studies Three CBA studies were conducted in moderate- to high-transmission areas in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Nigeria. There was a reduction in P falciparum parasitaemia prevalence in MDA groups compared to control groups during MDA (DiD range: -15.8 to -61.4 percentage points), but the effect varied at one to three months after MDA (DiD range: 14.9 to -41.1 percentage points). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In moderate- to high-transmission settings, no studies reported important effects on P falciparum parasitaemia prevalence within six months after MDA. In very low- to low-transmission settings, parasitaemia prevalence and incidence were reduced initially for up to three months for both P falciparum and P vivax; longer-term data did not demonstrate an effect after four months, but absolute risks in both intervention and control groups were low. No studies provided evidence of interruption of malaria transmission.
评估在疟疾流行地区进行大规模药物驱虫(MDA)的研究表明,干预后疟疾的传播立即减少。然而,这些效果因流行程度而异,并且不能持续。自本 Cochrane 综述 2013 年关于这一主题以来,已经发表了更多的研究。
主要目的是评估抗疟药物 MDA 的持续效果:- 在中度至高度传播环境中减少疟疾传播;- 在极低至低度传播环境中中断传播。次要目的是总结 MDA 后与药物相关的不良事件的风险。
我们检索了几个试验注册处、引文数据库、会议记录和参考文献,以获取截至 2021 年 2 月 11 日的相关文章。我们还与研究人员沟通,以确定已发表和未发表的研究。
随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机研究,将 MDA 与平衡的共同干预措施进行比较,在每个研究臂中至少有两个在地理上不同的地点。
两名综述作者独立评估试验的纳入标准并提取数据。我们计算了相对风险(RR)和率比(RR),以比较 MDA 组与无 MDA 组的患病率和发病率。我们根据疟疾传播和疟疾病种进行分层分析。对于集群随机对照试验(cRCT),我们使用簇内相关系数调整标准误差。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。对于非随机对照前后(CBA)研究,我们使用差异分析(DiD)汇总数据。
有 13 项研究符合纳入标准。其中 10 项为 cRCT,3 项为 CBA。集群随机对照试验中度至高度流行地区(患病率≥10%)我们纳入了来自冈比亚和赞比亚的两项研究的数据。在 MDA 后一到三个月,恶性疟原虫(以下简称 Pf)寄生虫血症患病率估计可能高于对照组,但置信区间包括无影响(RR 1.76,95%CI 0.58 至 5.36;赞比亚研究;低确定性证据);寄生虫血症发病率可能较低(RR 0.61,95%CI 0.40 至 0.92;冈比亚研究;中度确定性证据);确诊疟疾发病率可能显著降低,但置信区间包括无影响(率比 0.41,95%CI 0.04 至 4.42;赞比亚研究;低确定性证据)。在 MDA 后四到六个月,MDA 对 Pf 寄生虫血症患病率几乎没有或没有影响(RR 1.18,95%CI 0.89 至 1.56;冈比亚研究;中度确定性证据),并且没有持续的影响(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.55 至 1.50;冈比亚研究)。极低至低度流行地区(患病率<10%)来自柬埔寨、老挝、缅甸(两项研究)、越南、赞比亚和桑给巴尔的七项研究评估了多次 MDA 对 Pf 的影响。MDA 后立即(MDA 后不到一个月),寄生虫血症患病率降低(RR 0.12,95%CI 0.03 至 0.52;一项研究;低确定性证据)。在 MDA 后一到三个月,寄生虫血症发病率和患病率均降低(发病率:RR 0.37,95%CI 0.21 至 0.55;一项研究;中度确定性证据;患病率:RR 0.25,95%CI 0.15 至 0.41;七项研究;低确定性证据)。对于确诊的疟疾发病率,绝对率较低,并且不确定 MDA 是否对该结果有影响(RR 0.58,95%CI 0.12 至 2.73;两项研究;非常低确定性证据)。对于 Pf 寄生虫血症患病率,相对差异随时间逐渐降低,从 MDA 后四个月的 RR 0.63(95%CI 0.36 至 1.12;四项研究),到 MDA 后 7 至 12 个月的 RR 0.86(95%CI 0.55 至 1.36;五项研究)。更长时间的患病率估计显示总体绝对风险较低,MDA 对患病率的相对效应估计值在 MDA 后 13 至 18 个月时为 RR 0.82(95%CI 0.20 至 3.34),在 MDA 后 31 至 36 个月时为 RR 1.25(95%CI 0.25 至 6.31),在一项研究中。来自柬埔寨、老挝、缅甸(两项研究)和越南的五项研究评估了 MDA 对 Pf vivax(以下简称 Pv)的影响。MDA 后一个月,Pv 患病率较低(RR 0.18,95%CI 0.08 至 0.40;一项研究;低确定性证据)。在 MDA 后一到三个月,Pv 患病率降低(RR 0.15,95%CI 0.10 至 0.24;五项研究;低确定性证据)。Pv 患病率的立即降低并没有随着时间的推移而持续,从 MDA 后四个月的 RR 0.78(95%CI 0.63 至 0.95;四项研究),到 MDA 后 7 至 12 个月的 RR 1.12(95%CI 0.94 至 1.32;五项研究)。缅甸的一项研究提供了更长时间的影响估计,其中总体绝对风险较低,范围从 MDA 后 13 至 18 个月的 RR 0.81(95%CI 0.44 至 1.48),到 MDA 后 31 至 36 个月的 RR 1.20(95%CI 0.44 至 3.29)。非随机研究三项 CBA 研究在布基纳法索、肯尼亚和尼日利亚的中度至高度传播地区进行。在 MDA 期间,MDA 组的 Pf 寄生虫血症患病率比对照组降低(DiD 范围:-15.8 至-61.4 个百分点),但在 MDA 后一到三个月的效果不同(DiD 范围:14.9 至-41.1 个百分点)。
在中度至高度传播环境中,没有研究报告 MDA 后六个月内对 Pf 寄生虫血症患病率有重要影响。在极低至低度传播环境中,Pf 和 Pv 的寄生虫血症患病率和发病率在最初三个月内均有所降低;在四个月后,没有更长时间的数据表明有影响,但干预组和对照组的绝对风险都较低。没有研究提供疟疾传播中断的证据。