Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.
School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.
J Environ Sci (China). 2021 Dec;110:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
To ensure the safety of drinking water, ozone (O) has been extensively applied in drinking water treatment plants to further remove natural organic matter (NOM). However, the surface water and groundwater near the coastal areas often contain high concentrations of bromide ion (Br). Considering the risk of bromate (BrO) formation in ozonation of the sand-filtered water, the inhibitory efficiencies of hydrogen peroxide (HO) and ammonia (NH) on BrO formation during ozonation process were compared. The addition of HO effectively inhibited BrO formation at an initial Br concentration amended to 350 µg/L. The inhibition efficiencies reached 59.6 and 100% when the mass ratio of HO/O was 0.25 and > 0.5, respectively. The UV and total organic carbon (TOC) also decreased after adding HO, while the formation potential of trihalomethanes (THMsFP) increased especially in subsequent chlorination process at a low dose of HO. To control the formation of both BrO and THMs, a relatively large dose of O and a high ratio of HO/Owere generally needed. NH addition inhibited BrO formation when the background ammonia nitrogen (NHN) concentration was low. There was no significant correlation between BrO inhibition efficiency and NH dose, and a small amount of NHN (0.2 mg/L) could obviously inhibit BrO formation. The oxidation of NOM seemed unaffected by NH addition, and the structure of NOM reflected by synchronous fluorescence (SF) scanning remained almost unchanged before and after adding NH. Considering the formation of BrO and THMs, the optimal dose of NH was suggested to be 0.5 mg/L.
为确保饮用水安全,臭氧(O)已广泛应用于饮用水处理厂,以进一步去除天然有机物(NOM)。然而,沿海地区的地表水和地下水通常含有高浓度的溴离子(Br)。考虑到砂滤水臭氧氧化过程中溴酸盐(BrO)形成的风险,比较了过氧化氢(HO)和氨(NH)对臭氧氧化过程中 BrO 形成的抑制效率。在初始 Br 浓度提高到 350 µg/L 的情况下,HO 的添加有效地抑制了 BrO 的形成。当 HO/O 的质量比分别为 0.25 和 >0.5 时,抑制效率分别达到 59.6%和 100%。添加 HO 后,UV 和总有机碳(TOC)也降低了,而三卤甲烷形成潜力(THMsFP)在 HO 剂量较低的后续氯化过程中增加了,特别是在 HO 剂量较低的后续氯化过程中增加了。为了控制 BrO 和 THMs 的形成,通常需要较大剂量的 O 和高 HO/O 比。当背景氨氮(NHN)浓度较低时,NH 加标会抑制 BrO 的形成。BrO 抑制效率与 NH 剂量之间没有显著相关性,少量 NHN(0.2 mg/L)可明显抑制 BrO 的形成。NOM 的氧化似乎不受 NH 加标影响,添加 NH 前后通过同步荧光(SF)扫描反映的 NOM 结构几乎保持不变。考虑到 BrO 和 THMs 的形成,建议 NH 的最佳剂量为 0.5 mg/L。