Suppr超能文献

腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞(iPACK)与膝关节周围局部浸润镇痛在单侧全膝关节置换术后的疗效比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。

Efficacy of interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) block versus periarticular local infiltration analgesia after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: Prospective randomized control trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology (Narejo, Abdulwahab, Aqil, Alsubaie, Alzahrani, Thallaj); from the Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Aljurayyan), King Saud University Medical City; and from the Department of Anesthesiology (Hazazy), Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2021 Oct;42(10):1065-1071. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.10.20210504.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) block with periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) to assess postoperative pain control and enhanced recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This research was carried out at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from September 2020 to March 2021. Eighty Patients scheduled for elective unilateral TKA were randomized to receive either iPACK or periarticular LIA along with adductor canal block under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score, and secondary outcomes included physical rehabilitation, duration of surgery, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, hemodynamics, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The pain score during activity in iPACK group was significantly lower compared to LIA group at 4 hours postoperatively, but no significant difference was observed at 24 or 48 hours. The timed up and go test took significantly longer for patients in LIA group at 4, 24, and 48 hours compared to those in iPACK group. No significant differences in knee range of motion were observed between the 2 groups at any point.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, iPACK block is an effective technique in reducing pain in the immediate postoperative period without affecting motor function, resulting in enhanced recovery following primary TKA.

摘要

目的

比较胭动脉与膝关节囊间隙(iPACK)阻滞与关节周围局部浸润镇痛(LIA)在全膝关节置换术后(TKA)疼痛控制和加速康复方面的疗效。

方法

本研究于 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 3 月在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的沙特国王大学医学城进行。将 80 例拟行单侧 TKA 的患者随机分为 iPACK 或关节周围 LIA 组,两组均在椎管内麻醉下行收肌管阻滞。主要结局是术后疼痛评分,次要结局包括体格康复、手术时间、麻醉后监护室停留时间、血液动力学和住院时间。

结果

与 LIA 组相比,iPACK 组术后 4 小时活动时疼痛评分显著降低,但 24 小时或 48 小时时无显著差异。LIA 组在术后 4、24 和 48 小时的计时起立行走试验时间明显长于 iPACK 组。两组在任何时间点的膝关节活动范围均无显著差异。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,iPACK 阻滞技术可有效减轻术后即刻疼痛,而不影响运动功能,从而促进初次 TKA 后的加速康复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd45/9129249/064243444e94/SaudiMedJ-42-10-1065_page_4_1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验