Suppr超能文献

9 分钟结肠镜退镜时间与 6 分钟结肠镜退镜时间的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

A comparison of 9-min colonoscopy withdrawal time and 6-min colonoscopy withdrawal time: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3260-3267. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15701. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time is still a controversial topic. While several studies demonstrate that longer withdrawal time improves adenoma detection rate, others have contradicted these findings.

METHODS

Three independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles published from inception to January 2021 and included studies reporting comparison of the two cohorts-(i) ≥ 6 but less than 9 min of colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT) and (ii) ≥ 9 min of CWT. The outcome measures were the following: (i) adenoma detection rate (ADR), (ii) advanced ADR, and (iii) sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (SDR). The meta-analysis was performed, and the statistics were two-tailed.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria after a thorough search of the literature was completed. The analysis revealed that ≥ 9 min of CWT had significantly higher odds of adenoma detection as compared with 6-9 min of CWT (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.82; I  = 93.7). Additionally, a significantly higher odds of sessile serrated adenoma detection (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22; I  = 0) and a trend towards higher odds of advanced adenoma detection (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.95, I  = 90) were seen with CWT of at least 9 min when compared with 6-9 min of CWT.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis analysis provides further evidence that at least 9 min of CWT cohort had significantly higher ADR and SDR as compared with the at least 6 min but less than 9 min of cohort.

摘要

简介

最佳结肠镜退镜时间仍存在争议。虽然几项研究表明,较长的退镜时间可提高腺瘤检出率,但其他研究则对此发现提出了质疑。

方法

三位独立评审员对从开始到 2021 年 1 月发表的所有原始文章进行了全面审查,并纳入了比较两组的研究报告-(i)结肠镜退镜时间(CWT)≥6 但<9 分钟和(ii)CWT 至少 9 分钟。主要观察指标是:(i)腺瘤检出率(ADR),(ii)高级腺瘤检出率(AADR)和(iii)平坦型锯齿状腺瘤检出率(SDR)。进行了荟萃分析,统计采用双侧。

结果

在对文献进行全面检索后,共有 7 项研究符合纳入标准。分析显示,与 6-9 分钟的 CWT 相比,CWT 至少 9 分钟时腺瘤检出率明显更高(优势比[OR]1.54,95%置信区间[CI]1.30-1.82;I²=93.7)。此外,与 6-9 分钟的 CWT 相比,CWT 至少 9 分钟时发现平坦型锯齿状腺瘤的几率显著更高(OR 1.68,95%置信区间[CI]1.28-2.22;I²=0),且高级腺瘤检出率也有增高的趋势(OR 1.38,95%置信区间[CI]0.98-1.95,I²=90)。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析进一步表明,与至少 6 分钟但<9 分钟的 CWT 相比,至少 9 分钟的 CWT 组的 ADR 和 SDR 明显更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验