Chathuranga Gayashan, Dissanayake Thushari, Fernando Neluka, Wanigatunge Chandanie
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Int J Microbiol. 2021 Sep 28;2021:7572215. doi: 10.1155/2021/7572215. eCollection 2021.
Prophylactic and empirical antibiotic use is essential in cancer patients due to the underlying immune deficiencies. We examined the spectrum of causative bacteria and the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic prescription for three selected infections in cancer patients. . A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Cancer (NIC), Sri Lanka, from June 2018 to February 2019. Bacterial isolates obtained from adult cancer patients with a diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), or urinary tract infections (UTI) were included. Causative bacteria were identified and the antibiotic susceptibility was determined by standard microbiological methods. Empirical therapy was defined as appropriate if the isolated pathogen was susceptible in vitro to the given antibiotic.
A total of 155 bacterial isolates were included in the analysis. LRTI were the most prevalent infections (37.2%, 55/148) encountered during the study period. Majority (90.9%) of the isolated bacteria were ESKAPE pathogens. was the most frequent pathogen causing LRTI (42.4%, 25/59), whereas (32%, 16/50) and (26.1%, 12/46) predominated in UTI and SSTI, respectively. Meropenem was the most prescribed empirical antibiotic for LRTI (29.1%, 16/55) and SSTI (26.6%, 11/43) while it was ceftazidime for UTI (36%, 18/50). Only 20.6% (32/155) of the isolated bacteria were susceptible to the empirical antibiotic prescribed while 48.4% (75/155) were resistant to them. The prescribed empirical antibiotic did not have the spectrum of activity for the isolated bacteria in 29% (45/155) of cases.
High resistance rates were observed against the prescribed empirical antibiotics. National empirical antibiotic guidelines should be revised with updated data on causative organisms and their susceptibility patterns to ensure appropriate empirical antibiotic prescription.
由于癌症患者存在潜在的免疫缺陷,预防性和经验性使用抗生素至关重要。我们研究了癌症患者三种特定感染的病原菌谱以及经验性抗生素处方的合理性。2018年6月至2019年2月在斯里兰卡国家癌症研究所(NIC)进行了一项描述性横断面研究。纳入了诊断为下呼吸道感染(LRTI)、皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)或尿路感染(UTI)的成年癌症患者分离出的细菌。通过标准微生物学方法鉴定病原菌并确定抗生素敏感性。如果分离出的病原体在体外对给定抗生素敏感,则经验性治疗被定义为适当。
共155株细菌分离株纳入分析。LRTI是研究期间最常见的感染(37.2%,55/148)。分离出的细菌大多数(90.9%)是ESKAPE病原体。是导致LRTI最常见的病原体(42.4%,25/59),而分别在UTI和SSTI中占主导地位(32%,16/50)和(26.1%,12/46)。美罗培南是LRTI(29.1%,16/55)和SSTI(26.6%,11/43)最常用的经验性抗生素,而UTI(36%,18/50)则是头孢他啶。分离出的细菌中只有20.6%(32/155)对所开的经验性抗生素敏感,而48.4%(75/155)对其耐药。在29%(45/155)的病例中,所开的经验性抗生素对分离出的细菌没有活性谱。
观察到对所开经验性抗生素的高耐药率。应根据病原菌及其药敏模式的最新数据修订国家经验性抗生素指南,以确保经验性抗生素处方的合理性。