The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2022 Sep-Oct;55(5):359-374. doi: 10.1177/00222194211047635. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether positive results from a word-problem intervention implemented one-to-one contributed to similar outcomes when implemented in small groups of three to four students. Third-grade students experiencing mathematics difficulty ( = 76) were randomly assigned to word-problem intervention ( = 56) or business-as-usual comparison ( = 20). Intervention occurred for 13 weeks, 3 times per week, 30 min per session. Multilevel models revealed the intervention condition significantly outperformed the BaU on a proximal word-problem outcome, corroborating results from our prior individual intervention. When comparing student performance in the individual versus small-group intervention, findings suggest students received added benefit from the individual intervention. The word-problem intervention successfully translated to a small-group setting, which holds important implications for educators working with students in supplemental, targeted, or Tier 2 mathematics intervention settings.
本试点研究旨在确定一对一实施的应用题干预取得积极成果后,是否也能为三到四名学生组成的小组带来类似的效果。三年级有数学困难的学生(n=76)被随机分配到应用题干预组(n=56)或常规教学对照组(n=20)。干预持续了 13 周,每周 3 次,每次 30 分钟。多层模型显示,干预组在近期的应用题结果上显著优于对照组,这与我们之前的个体干预结果一致。将个体干预与小组干预中学生的表现进行比较后发现,学生从个体干预中获得了额外的收益。该应用题干预方案成功地应用于小组环境,这对在补充性、有针对性或第二层次的数学干预环境中与学生一起工作的教育工作者具有重要意义。