Pate Joshua W, Simons Laura E, Rush Gillian, Hancock Mark J, Hush Julia M, Verhagen Arianne, Pacey Verity
Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Clin J Pain. 2021 Oct 12;38(1):32-40. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000990.
Assessing knowledge and beliefs regarding pain science can identify gaps and misconceptions. The Concept of Pain Inventory (COPI) was recently developed in children with the intent to guide targeted pain science education. We utilized the original COPI item pool to (1) develop a tool to assess an adult's concept of pain in a cohort who had not received pain science education, (2) evaluate its psychometric properties, (3) examine distribution of scores in a cohort of adults who had received pain science education, and (4) examine associations between scores and clinical variables.
A total cohort of 627 adults were recruited through social media for an online survey. Initial development was conducted on those who had not received prior pain science education (n=125), then the COPI-Adult tool was tested in those who had received prior pain science education (n=502).
The resulting unidimensional 13-item COPI-Adult had acceptable internal consistency (α=0.78) and good test-retest reliability at 1 week (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient3,1=0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.91). Higher COPI-Adult scores reflect greater alignment with contemporary pain science. COPI-Adult scores were correlated with revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ) scores and inversely correlated with average and current pain intensity, and pain interference. Adults who reported having received pain science education had significantly higher mean COPI-Adult scores than those who had not, and this difference exceeded the smallest detectable change.
The COPI-Adult is a brief questionnaire with promising psychometric properties to identify conceptual gaps or misconceptions to inform individualized pain science education.
评估有关疼痛科学的知识和信念能够识别差距和误解。疼痛概念量表(COPI)最近在儿童中开发,旨在指导有针对性的疼痛科学教育。我们利用原始的COPI项目库来(1)开发一种工具,以评估未接受过疼痛科学教育的队列中成年人的疼痛概念,(2)评估其心理测量特性,(3)检查接受过疼痛科学教育的成年人队列中的分数分布,以及(4)检查分数与临床变量之间的关联。
通过社交媒体招募了627名成年人进行在线调查。最初在未接受过先前疼痛科学教育的人群(n = 125)中进行开发,然后在接受过先前疼痛科学教育的人群(n = 502)中测试COPI成人版工具。
最终得到的13项单维度COPI成人版具有可接受的内部一致性(α = 0.78),并且在1周时具有良好的重测信度(组内相关系数3,1 = 0.84(95%置信区间:0.71 - 0.91))。较高的COPI成人版分数反映与当代疼痛科学的更大一致性。COPI成人版分数与修订后的疼痛神经生理学问卷(rNPQ)分数相关,与平均和当前疼痛强度以及疼痛干扰呈负相关。报告接受过疼痛科学教育的成年人的平均COPI成人版分数显著高于未接受过的成年人,并且这种差异超过了最小可检测变化。
COPI成人版是一份简短的问卷,具有良好的心理测量特性,可用于识别概念上的差距或误解,为个性化的疼痛科学教育提供依据。