Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Trust of Verona, University of Verona-School of Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Trust of Verona, University of Verona-School of Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;79:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.048. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
At our institution, we adopted routinely ultrasound guided approach for all percutaneous procedures. The objective of this study was to describe the predictors of access site failures (ASFs) in patients undergoing percutaneous aorto iliac revascularization and to also evaluate whether other factors such as time period or different vascular devices may influence outcomes in terms of ASFs.
We reviewed all consecutive percutaneous revascularizations performed for aortoiliac occlusion or stenosis at our institution from 2011 to 2020. All procedure were performed using an ultrasound (US) guided common femoral access. The primary outcome was ASFs, defined as bleeding or groin hematomas that required transfusions; pseduoaneurysm (diagnosed by US); retroperitoneal hematoma; artery laceration or ruptured (diagnosed intraoperatively); and thrombosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of ASFs.
A total of 502 femoral arteries were accessed under DUS guidance with no failure in sheath placement. Technical success was achieved in 498 of 502 procedures (99.2%). ASFs occurred in 21 patients (7%); but year of procedure appear to be associated with an excess of ASFs as rates were different between the first and second period of the study (10.9% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.04). Results of multivariable logistic regression model indicated that independent predictors of ASFs were common femoral artery (CFA) calcification peripheral artery calcium scoring system (PACCS) grade (odds ratio [OR], 8.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5-13.7), and CFA diameter (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85). Compared to patients with successful percutaneous access, ASFs resulted in longer post-op lengths of stay (P = < 0.001).
Percutaneous US guided access can be safely performed in patients undergoing endovascular procedures for aorto iliac revascularization with TASC C and D lesions. CFA calcification PACCS grade greater than 3 and smaller femoral vessel diameter are independent risk factors for ASFs.
在我们的机构中,我们对所有经皮手术都采用常规超声引导方法。本研究的目的是描述接受经皮腹主动脉髂血管重建术患者的入路部位失败(ASF)的预测因素,并评估其他因素(如时间段或不同的血管设备)是否会影响 ASF 方面的结果。
我们回顾了 2011 年至 2020 年在我们机构进行的所有用于治疗腹主动脉髂动脉闭塞或狭窄的经皮血管重建术。所有手术均采用超声(US)引导的股总动脉入路。主要结果是 ASF,定义为需要输血的出血或腹股沟血肿;假性动脉瘤(US 诊断);腹膜后血肿;动脉撕裂或破裂(术中诊断);和血栓形成。多变量逻辑回归用于确定 ASF 的预测因素。
共有 502 条股动脉在 DUS 引导下进行穿刺,无一例鞘管放置失败。498 例(99.2%)手术技术成功。21 例(7%)发生 ASF;但研究期间的年份似乎与 ASF 过多有关,因为两个研究期间的发生率不同(10.9%与 4.8%,P=0.04)。多变量逻辑回归模型的结果表明,ASF 的独立预测因素是股总动脉(CFA)钙化外周动脉钙评分系统(PACCS)分级(优势比[OR],8.7;95%置信区间[CI],5.5-13.7)和 CFA 直径(OR,0.46;95%CI,0.25-0.85)。与经皮成功入路的患者相比,ASF 导致术后住院时间延长(P<0.001)。
在 TASC C 和 D 病变的腹主动脉髂血管重建术患者中,经皮超声引导入路可安全进行。CFA 钙化 PACCS 分级大于 3 和股动脉直径较小是 ASF 的独立危险因素。