Lam Sean, Liu Hong, Jian Zhongping, Settels Jos, Bohringer Christian
Anesthesiology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA.
Bioengineering, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Aug 31;13(8):e17610. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17610. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Invasive intraarterial blood pressure measurement is currently the gold standard for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring but accurate systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement is difficult in everyday clinical practice, mostly because of problems with hyper-resonance or damping within the measurement system, which can lead to erroneous treatment decisions if these phenomena are not recognized. A hyper-resonant blood pressure trace significantly overestimates true systolic blood pressure while underestimating the diastolic pressure. Invasively measured systolic blood pressure is also significantly more affected than mean blood pressure by the site of measurement within the arterial system. Patients in the intraoperative period should be treated based on the invasively measured mean blood pressure rather than the systolic blood pressure. In this review, we discuss the pros/cons, mechanisms of invasive blood pressure measurements, and the interpretation of the invasively measured systolic blood pressure value.
有创动脉血压测量目前是术中血流动力学监测的金标准,但在日常临床实践中准确测量收缩压(SBP)很困难,主要是因为测量系统存在过度共振或阻尼问题,如果这些现象未被识别,可能导致错误的治疗决策。过度共振的血压波形会显著高估真实收缩压,同时低估舒张压。在动脉系统内,测量部位对有创测量的收缩压影响也明显大于平均血压。术中患者应根据有创测量的平均血压而非收缩压进行治疗。在本综述中,我们讨论了有创血压测量的优缺点、机制以及对有创测量的收缩压值的解读。