Suppr超能文献

葡萄 Rpv3、Rpv10 和 Rpv12 介导的对白粉病的防御反应以及它们的应用对葡萄种植业中杀菌剂使用的影响。

Grapevine Rpv3-, Rpv10- and Rpv12-mediated defense responses against Plasmopara viticola and the impact of their deployment on fungicide use in viticulture.

机构信息

State Education and Research Center of Viticulture, Horticulture and Rural Development, Neustadt/Weinstr, Germany.

Centre for Organismal Studies Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03228-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The high susceptibility of European grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera) to downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) leads to the intensive use of fungicides in viticulture. To reduce this input, breeding programs have introgressed resistance loci from wild Vitis species into V. vinifera, resulting in new fungus-resistant grapevine cultivars (FRC). However, little is known about how these different resistance loci confer resistance and what the potential reduction in fungicide applications are likely to be if these FRCs are deployed. To ensure a durable and sustainable resistance management and breeding, detailed knowledge about the different defense mechanisms mediated by the respective Rpv (Resistance to P. viticola) resistance loci is essential.

RESULTS

A comparison of the resistance mechanisms mediated by the Rpv3-1, Rpv10 and/or Rpv12-loci revealed an early onset of programmed cell death (PCD) at 8 hours post infection (hpi) in Rpv12-cultivars and 12 hpi in Rpv10-cultivars, whereas cell death was delayed in Rpv3-cultivars and was not observed until 28 hpi. These temporal differences correlated with an increase in the trans-resveratrol level and the formation of hydrogen peroxide shortly before onset of PCD. The differences in timing of onset of Rpv-loci specific defense reactions following downy mildew infection could be responsible for the observed differences in hyphal growth, sporulation and cultivar-specific susceptibility to this pathogen in the vineyard. Hereby, Rpv3- and Rpv12/Rpv3-cultivars showed a potential for a significant reduction of fungicide applications, depending on the annual P. viticola infection pressure and the Rpv-loci. Furthermore, we report on the discovery of a new P. viticola isolate that is able to overcome both Rpv3- and Rpv12-mediated resistance.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that differences in the timing of the defense reaction mediated by the Rpv3-, Rpv10- and Rpv12-loci, result in different degrees of natural resistance to downy mildew in field. Vineyard trials demonstrate that Rpv12/Rpv3- and Rpv3-cultivars are a powerful tool to reduce the dependence of grape production on fungicide applications. Furthermore, this study indicates the importance of sustainable breeding and plant protection strategies based on resistant grapevine cultivars to reduce the risk of new P. viticola isolates that are able to overcome the respective resistance mechanism.

摘要

背景

欧洲葡萄品种(Vitis vinifera)对霜霉病(Plasmopara viticola)的高度易感性导致葡萄栽培中大量使用杀菌剂。为了减少这种投入,育种计划已经将野生葡萄物种的抗性基因座导入到 V. vinifera 中,从而产生了新的抗真菌葡萄品种(FRC)。然而,对于这些不同的抗性基因座如何赋予抗性以及如果部署这些 FRC,可能会减少多少杀菌剂的应用,知之甚少。为了确保持久和可持续的抗性管理和育种,详细了解各自的 Rpv(抗 Plasmopara viticola)抗性基因座介导的不同防御机制至关重要。

结果

对 Rpv3-1、Rpv10 和/或 Rpv12 基因座介导的抗性机制进行比较,结果表明在 Rpv12 品种中,感染后 8 小时(hpi)就会出现程序性细胞死亡(PCD),而在 Rpv10 品种中则在 12 hpi 时出现,而在 Rpv3 品种中,细胞死亡则被延迟,直到 28 hpi 才观察到。这些时间上的差异与 PCD 发生前短时间内反式白藜芦醇水平和过氧化氢的形成增加有关。霜霉病感染后 Rpv 基因座特异性防御反应开始时间的差异可能是导致葡萄园中原生真菌生长、孢子形成和品种特异性易感性差异的原因。因此,Rpv3-和 Rpv12/Rpv3 品种具有显著减少杀菌剂应用的潜力,具体取决于每年 Plasmopara viticola 的感染压力和 Rpv 基因座。此外,我们还报告了一种新的 Plasmopara viticola 分离株的发现,该分离株能够克服 Rpv3-和 Rpv12 介导的抗性。

结论

本研究表明,Rpv3-、Rpv10-和 Rpv12 基因座介导的防御反应时间的差异导致田间对霜霉病的天然抗性程度不同。葡萄园试验表明,Rpv12/Rpv3-和 Rpv3 品种是减少葡萄生产对杀菌剂依赖的有力工具。此外,本研究表明,基于抗性葡萄品种的可持续育种和植物保护策略的重要性,以降低能够克服各自抗性机制的新 Plasmopara viticola 分离株的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e6e/8515710/b71d56ce2125/12870_2021_3228_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验