Orenday-Barraza José Manuel, Cavagnaro María José, Avila Mauricio J, Strouse Isabel M, Dowell Aaron, Kisana Haroon, Khan Naushaba, Ravinsky Robert, Baaj Ali A
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:170-186.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.086. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
Spinal metastases are present in approximately 20% of patients with cancer, giving a risk for neurologic dysfunction and instability. In already frail patients, surgeons strive to improve quality of life. Our goal was to review a 10-year trend in the surgical management of spinal metastases.
A scoping review was performed systematically using PubMed to assess trends in surgical treatment for spinal metastases. The search terms used were: metastas∗, "neoplasm metastasis"[Mesh], "Spine"[Mesh], spine, spinal, "vertebral column," "vertebral body," laser, robot, radiofrequency, screws, fixation, "separation surgery," corpectomy, vertebrectomy, spondylectomy, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, surgery, "open surgery," "mini open surgery," "minimally invasive surgery," endoscopy, thoracoscopy, corpectom∗, vertebrectom∗, spondylectom∗, "en bloc," and MIS. The variables of interest were neurologic improvement, tumor recurrence, reoperation, and overall survival.
A total of 2132 articles were found within the primary query. Fifty-six studies were selected for final review. The results were organized into main surgical practices: decompression, mechanical stabilization, and pain management. For separation surgery, clinical outcomes were overall 1-year survival, 40.7%-78.4%; recurrence rate, 4.3%-22%; reoperation, 5%; and complications, 5.4%-14%. For corpectomy, clinical outcomes were overall 1-year survival, 30%-92%; reoperation, 1.1%-50%; and recurrence rate, of 1.1%-28%. Complications and reoperations with spinal instrumentation were 0%-13.6% and 0%-15%, respectively. Cement augmentation achieved pain reduction rates of 56%-100%, neurologic improvement/stability 84%-100%, and complication rates 6%-56%. Laser achieved local tumor control rate of 71%-82% at 1 year follow-up, reoperation rate of 15%-31%, and complication rate of 5%-26%.
Minimally invasive techniques for decompression and stabilization seem to be the preferred method to surgically treat metastatic spine disease, with good outcomes. More research with high level of evidence is required to support the long-term outcomes of these approaches.
约20%的癌症患者存在脊柱转移,存在神经功能障碍和脊柱不稳定的风险。对于本就身体虚弱的患者,外科医生致力于提高其生活质量。我们的目标是回顾脊柱转移瘤外科治疗的10年趋势。
使用PubMed系统进行范围综述,以评估脊柱转移瘤外科治疗的趋势。使用的检索词为:metastas∗、“肿瘤转移”[医学主题词]、“脊柱”[医学主题词]、spine、spinal、“脊柱”、“椎体”、laser、robot、radiofrequency、screws、fixation、“分离手术”、椎体次全切除术、椎骨切除术、脊椎整块切除术、椎体成形术、后凸成形术、手术、“开放手术”、“迷你开放手术”、“微创手术”、内镜检查、胸腔镜检查、corpectom∗、vertebrectom∗、spondylectom∗、“整块”和MIS。感兴趣的变量为神经功能改善、肿瘤复发、再次手术和总生存期。
在初始检索中总共找到2132篇文章。最终纳入56项研究进行综述。结果按主要手术方式进行整理:减压、机械稳定和疼痛管理。对于分离手术,临床结果为1年总生存率40.7% - 78.4%;复发率4.3% - 22%;再次手术率5%;并发症发生率5.4% - 14%。对于椎体次全切除术,临床结果为1年总生存率30% - 92%;再次手术率1.1% - 50%;复发率1.1% - 28%。脊柱内固定的并发症和再次手术率分别为0% - 13.6%和0% - 15%。骨水泥强化的疼痛缓解率为56% - 100%,神经功能改善/稳定性为84% - 100%,并发症发生率为6% - 56%。激光在1年随访时的局部肿瘤控制率为71% - 82%,再次手术率为15% - 31%,并发症发生率为5% - 26%。
减压和稳定的微创手术似乎是治疗转移性脊柱疾病的首选手术方法,效果良好。需要更多高质量证据的研究来支持这些方法的长期疗效。