Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.
Psychol Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;38(7):827-846. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1988598. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
Many adolescents report a lack of physical activity (PA) and excess screen time (ST). Psychological theories aiming to understand these behaviours typically focus on predictors of only one behaviour. Yet, behaviour enactment is often a choice between options. This study sought to examine predictors of PA and ST in a single model. Variables were drawn from dual process models, which portray behaviour as the outcome of deliberative and automatic processes.
411 Finnish vocational school students (age 17-19) completed a survey, comprising variables from the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) and automaticity pertaining to PA and ST, and self-reported PA and ST four weeks later.
Self-reported time spent on PA and ST and their predictors.
PA and ST correlated negatively (r = -.17, p = .03). Structural equation modelling revealed that intentions and habit for PA predicted PA while ST was predicted by intentions and habit for ST and negatively by PA intentions. RAA-cognitions predicted intentions.
PA and ST and their psychological predictors seem to be weakly interlinked. Future studies should assess more behaviours and related psychological influences to get a better picture of connections between different behaviours.
HighlightsPhysical activity and screen time are largely mutually exclusive classes of behaviours and might therefore be related in terms of their psychological predictors.411 adolescent vocational school students self-reported variables from the Reasoned Action Approach and behavioural automaticity related to physical activity and leisure time screen time behaviours as well as those behaviours.Structural equation modelling revealed expected within-behaviour predictions but, against expectations, no strong connections between the two behaviour classes in terms of their predictors. Only intentions to engage in physical activity negatively predicted screen time.Future research should aim to measure a wider range of mutually exclusive classes of behaviours that cover a large share of the day to uncover relations between behaviours and their respective predictors.
许多青少年报告缺乏身体活动(PA)和过度的屏幕时间(ST)。旨在理解这些行为的心理理论通常侧重于仅一种行为的预测因素。然而,行为实施通常是在选项之间进行选择。本研究旨在在单一模型中检验 PA 和 ST 的预测因素。变量来自双过程模型,该模型将行为描绘为深思熟虑和自动过程的结果。
411 名芬兰职业学校学生(17-19 岁)完成了一项调查,其中包括来自理性行为方法(RAA)和与 PA 和 ST 自动性相关的变量,以及四周后自我报告的 PA 和 ST。
自我报告的 PA 和 ST 时间及其预测因素。
PA 和 ST 呈负相关(r = -.17,p =.03)。结构方程模型显示,PA 的意图和习惯预测 PA,而 ST 则由 ST 的意图和习惯以及 PA 意图的负预测来预测。RAA 认知预测意图。
PA 和 ST 及其心理预测因素似乎联系较弱。未来的研究应该评估更多的行为和相关的心理影响,以更好地了解不同行为之间的联系。
身体活动和屏幕时间在很大程度上是相互排斥的行为类别,因此它们的心理预测因素可能相关。
411 名青少年职业学校学生自我报告了理性行为方法和与身体活动和闲暇时间屏幕时间行为相关的行为自动性的变量,以及这些行为。
结构方程模型显示了预期的行为内预测,但出乎意料的是,两种行为类别之间在预测因素方面没有很强的联系。只有参与身体活动的意图会负预测屏幕时间。
未来的研究应该旨在测量更广泛的相互排斥的行为类别,这些类别涵盖了一天中的大部分时间,以揭示行为及其各自预测因素之间的关系。