Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2124-2134. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.127. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
Despite Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries missing their maternal mortality ratio (MMR) targets for Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5, limited attention has been paid to policy design in the literature examining the persistence of preventable maternal mortality. This study examined the specific policy interventions designed to reduce maternal deaths in Uganda and identified particular policy design issues that underpinned MDG 5 performance. We suggest a novel prescriptive and analytical (re)conceptualization of policy in terms of its fidelity to '3Cs' (coherence of design, comprehensiveness of coverage and consistency in application) that could have implications for future healthcare programming.
We conducted a retrospective study. Sixteen Ugandan maternal health policy documents and 21 national programme performance reports were examined, and six key informant interviews conducted with national stakeholders managing maternal health programmes during the reference period 2000-2015. We applied the analytical framework of the 'three delay model' combined with a broader literature on 'policy mixing.'
Despite introducing fourteen separate policy instruments over 15 years with the goal of reducing maternal mortality, by the end of the MDG period in 2015, only 87.5% of the interventions for the three delays were covered with a notable lack of coherence and consistency evident among the instruments. The three delays persisted at the frontline with 70% of deaths by 2014 attributed to failures in referral policies while 67% of maternal deaths were due to inadequacies in healthcare facilities and trained personnel in the same period. By 2015, 37.3% of deaths were due to transportation issues.
The piecemeal introduction of additional policy instruments frequently distorted existing synergies among policies resulting in persistence of the three delays and missed MDG 5 target. Future policy reforms should address the 'three delays' but also ensure fidelity of policy design to coherence, comprehensiveness and consistency.
尽管乌干达和其他撒哈拉以南非洲国家未能实现千年发展目标 5 中的母婴死亡率目标,但在研究导致可预防母婴死亡持续存在的政策时,文献中对政策设计的关注有限。本研究考察了乌干达为降低母婴死亡率而设计的具体政策干预措施,并确定了支撑千年发展目标 5 实施的特定政策设计问题。我们建议根据政策对“3C”(设计一致性、覆盖范围全面性和应用一致性)的保真度,对政策进行新颖的规范性和分析性(重新)概念化,这可能对未来的医疗保健规划产生影响。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究。研究考察了 16 份乌干达母婴健康政策文件和 21 份国家方案绩效报告,并在参考期 2000-2015 年期间,对管理母婴健康方案的 6 名国家利益攸关方进行了 6 次关键知情人访谈。我们应用了“三拖延模型”的分析框架,并结合了更广泛的关于“政策组合”的文献。
尽管在 15 年内引入了 14 项单独的政策工具,目标是降低母婴死亡率,但到 2015 年千年发展目标期结束时,只有 87.5%的三个延迟干预措施得到了覆盖,而且工具之间明显缺乏一致性和一致性。三个延迟在前线仍然存在,到 2014 年,70%的死亡归因于转诊政策的失败,而同期 67%的母婴死亡归因于医疗保健设施和训练有素人员的不足。到 2015 年,37.3%的死亡归因于交通问题。
零碎地引入额外的政策工具经常扭曲政策之间现有的协同作用,导致三个延迟的持续存在,并导致千年发展目标 5 目标的落空。未来的政策改革应解决“三个延迟”问题,但也要确保政策设计的一致性、全面性和一致性。