Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Regional Hospital West Jutland, University Research Clinic, Herning, Denmark.
Department of Occupational Medicine, Hospital South West Jutland, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Jan;95(1):35-65. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01781-0. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a major cause of occupational disease. The aim was to review the relation between exposure to occupational irritants and ICD and the prognosis of ICD.
Through a systematic search, 1516 titles were identified, and 48 studies were included in the systematic review.
We found that the evidence for an association between ICD and occupational irritants was strong for wet work, moderate for detergents and non-alcoholic disinfectants, and strong for a combination. The highest quality studies provided limited evidence for an association with use of occlusive gloves without other exposures and moderate evidence with simultaneous exposure to other wet work irritants. The evidence for an association between minor ICD and exposure to metalworking fluids was moderate. Regarding mechanical exposures, the literature was scarce and the evidence limited. We found that the prognosis for complete healing of ICD is poor, but improves after decrease of exposure through change of occupation or work tasks. There was no substantial evidence for an influence of gender, age, or household exposures. Inclusion of atopic dermatitis in the analysis did not alter the risk of ICD. Studies were at risk of bias, mainly due to selection and misclassification of exposure and outcome. This may have attenuated the results.
This review reports strong evidence for an association between ICD and a combination of exposure to wet work and non-alcoholic disinfectants, moderate for metalworking fluids, limited for mechanical and glove exposure, and a strong evidence for a poor prognosis of ICD.
接触性刺激性皮炎(ICD)是职业病的主要病因。本研究旨在综述职业性接触刺激物与 ICD 的关系,以及 ICD 的预后。
通过系统检索,共确定了 1516 个标题,其中 48 项研究被纳入系统评价。
我们发现,ICD 与职业性接触刺激物之间的关联证据在接触湿工作、清洁剂和非酒精消毒剂、以及二者结合的情况下是强的;在使用无其他暴露的封闭手套和同时接触其他湿工作刺激物的情况下,高质量研究提供了有限的关联证据;在与使用金属加工液相关的轻度 ICD 方面,证据为中度;关于机械性暴露,文献很少,证据有限;我们发现 ICD 完全愈合的预后较差,但通过改变职业或工作任务减少接触后会有所改善。性别、年龄或家庭暴露对预后没有实质性影响。在分析中纳入特应性皮炎并不会改变 ICD 的风险。研究存在选择偏倚和暴露与结局的分类错误,这可能会削弱研究结果。
本综述报告了 ICD 与接触湿工作和非酒精消毒剂、金属加工液、机械性和手套暴露相关的强证据,与预后不良的强证据相关。