Crucq Arthur
Leiden University Centre for the Arts in Society, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Aug 27;13(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.15. eCollection 2020.
Linear perspective has long been used to create the illusion of three-dimensional space on the picture plane. One of its central axioms comes from Euclidean geometry and holds that all parallel lines converge in a single vanishing point. Although linear perspective provided the painter with a means to organize the painting, the question is whether the gaze of the beholder is also affected by the underlying structure of linear perspective: for instance, in such a way that the orthogonals leading to the vanishing point also automatically guides the beholder's gaze. This was researched during a pilot study by means of an eye-tracking experiment at the Lab for Cognitive Research in Art History (CReA) of the University of Vienna. It appears that in some compositions the vanishing point attracts the view of the participant. This effect is more significant when the vanishing point coincides with the central vertical axis of the painting, but is even stronger when the vanishing point also coincides with a major visual feature such as an object or figure. The latter calls into question what exactly attracts the gaze of the viewer, i.e., what comes first: the geometrical construct of the vanishing point or the visual feature?
线性透视长期以来一直被用于在画面平面上营造三维空间的错觉。其核心公理之一源自欧几里得几何学,即所有平行线会汇聚于一个单一的消失点。尽管线性透视为画家提供了一种组织绘画的方式,但问题在于观者的目光是否也会受到线性透视潜在结构的影响:例如,通向消失点的正交线是否也会自动引导观者的目光。维也纳大学艺术史认知研究实验室(CReA)通过一项眼动追踪实验在一项初步研究中对此进行了探究。结果显示,在某些构图中,消失点会吸引参与者的视线。当消失点与画面的中央垂直轴重合时,这种效果更为显著,但当消失点还与诸如物体或人物等主要视觉特征重合时,效果则更强。后者引发了一个问题,即究竟是什么吸引了观者的目光,也就是说,哪个先出现:消失点的几何结构还是视觉特征?