Dimitriadi Maria, Petropoulou Aikaterini, Masouras Konstantinos, Zafiropoulou Maria, Zinelis Spiros, Eliades George
Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;14(20):6025. doi: 10.3390/ma14206025.
To improve the self-curing capacity and interfacial strength with dentine of dual-cured composite materials, touch-cure activators have been introduced. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of these activators on the hardness and conversion of dual-cured resin composite core build-up restoratives. The materials tested were Clearfil DC Core Plus (CF) and Gradia Core (GC) with the corresponding adhesives Clearfil S Bond Plus (for CF) and G-Premio Bond/G-Premio DCA activator (for GC). Disk-shaped specimens (n = 6/group) were prepared for the following groups: dual-cured, self-cured and self-cured in contact with the adhesive activators at the bottom surface. After a 3-week storage period (dark/dry/37 °C) the Martens hardness (HM) and degree of conversion (DC%) were determined for the previously mentioned groups and the top surfaces of groups in contact with the adhesives. A statistical analysis was performed by a one-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak test per material and a Pearson's correlation analysis (HM vs. DC%) at an α = 0.05. The self-cured specimens resulted in significantly lower HM and DC% values from the dual-cured group, as expected. However, in the presence of the adhesives with touch-cure activators, the conversion of the self-cured groups showed insignificant differences in HM and DC% from the dual-cured in both composite materials. The improvements on the bottom composite surfaces in contact with the adhesives did not extend to the entire specimen length. Nevertheless, improved interfacial curing may improve interfacial durability.
为提高双固化复合材料的自固化能力及其与牙本质的界面强度,已引入触变固化活化剂。本研究的目的是评估这些活化剂对双固化树脂复合核桩修复材料硬度和转化率的影响。所测试的材料为Clearfil DC Core Plus(CF)和Gradia Core(GC),以及相应的粘结剂Clearfil S Bond Plus(用于CF)和G-Premio Bond/G-Premio DCA活化剂(用于GC)。制备圆盘形试件(每组n = 6)用于以下分组:双固化组、自固化组以及在底面与粘结剂活化剂接触的自固化组。在3周的储存期(黑暗/干燥/37℃)后,测定上述各组以及与粘结剂接触组试件顶面的马氏硬度(HM)和转化率(DC%)。对每种材料进行单因素方差分析和Holm-Sidak检验,并在α = 0.05水平进行Pearson相关性分析(HM与DC%)。正如预期的那样,自固化试件的HM和DC%值显著低于双固化组。然而,在存在触变固化活化剂的粘结剂时,两种复合材料中自固化组的转化率在HM和DC%方面与双固化组相比差异不显著。与粘结剂接触的复合材料底面的改善并未延伸至整个试件长度。尽管如此,改善的界面固化可能会提高界面耐久性。