Department of Human Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43017, USA.
Virta Health, San Francisco, CA 94015, USA.
Nutrients. 2021 Sep 22;13(10):3299. doi: 10.3390/nu13103299.
The decades-long dietary experiment embodied in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) focused on limiting fat, especially saturated fat, and higher carbohydrate intake has coincided with rapidly escalating epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) that are contributing to the progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other diet-related chronic diseases. Moreover, the lack of flexibility in the DGA as it pertains to low carbohydrate approaches does not align with the contemporary trend toward precision nutrition. We argue that personalizing the level of dietary carbohydrate should be a high priority based on evidence that Americans have a wide spectrum of metabolic variability in their tolerance to high carbohydrate loads. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and T2D are conditions strongly associated with insulin resistance, a condition exacerbated by increased dietary carbohydrate and improved by restricting carbohydrate. Low-carbohydrate diets are grounded across the time-span of human evolution, have well-established biochemical principles, and are now supported by multiple clinical trials in humans that demonstrate consistent improvements in multiple established risk factors associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recently recognized a low carbohydrate eating pattern as an effective approach for patients with diabetes. Despite this evidence base, low-carbohydrate diets are not reflected in the DGA. As the DGA Dietary Patterns have not been demonstrated to be universally effective in addressing the needs of many Americans and recognizing the lack of widely available treatments for obesity, metabolic syndrome, and T2D that are safe, effective, and sustainable, the argument for an alternative, low-carbohydrate Dietary Pattern is all the more compelling.
几十年来,《美国人膳食指南》(DGA)所体现的饮食实验专注于限制脂肪,尤其是饱和脂肪,以及增加碳水化合物的摄入量,这与肥胖和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的迅速流行同时发生,而这些疾病正导致心血管疾病(CVD)和其他与饮食相关的慢性疾病的进展。此外,DGA 中关于低碳水化合物方法的缺乏灵活性与现代精准营养的趋势不一致。我们认为,根据美国人对高碳水化合物负荷的耐受性存在广泛代谢变异性的证据,个性化饮食中碳水化合物的水平应该是一个高度优先考虑的问题。肥胖、代谢综合征和 T2D 与胰岛素抵抗密切相关,这种情况会因增加的饮食碳水化合物而恶化,并通过限制碳水化合物得到改善。低碳水化合物饮食在人类进化的整个过程中都有基础,有成熟的生化原理,并且现在得到了多项人类临床试验的支持,这些试验表明,与胰岛素抵抗和心血管疾病相关的多个既定风险因素的一致性改善。美国糖尿病协会(ADA)最近承认低碳水化合物饮食模式是糖尿病患者的有效治疗方法。尽管有这样的证据基础,但 DGA 中并没有反映低碳水化合物饮食。由于 DGA 饮食模式并没有被证明对许多美国人的需求具有普遍有效性,并且认识到缺乏安全、有效和可持续的肥胖、代谢综合征和 T2D 的广泛可用治疗方法,因此,低碳水化合物饮食模式的替代方案更具说服力。