Melaragno Andrew J
Division of Medical Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Department of Psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2021 Jun;19(2):145-160. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200048. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
In this review, the author examines the evidence for psychopharmacologic treatments among adults for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder derived from clinical trials. For each disorder, major categories of drugs are reviewed, and then the evidence-based medications in each category are discussed. The author reviews key safety and tolerability considerations for each of the medications or classes. Evidence-based dosing for most specific agents is displayed in a comprehensive reference table. Subsequently, the author synthesizes the available information to suggest a pragmatic stepwise approach to treatment that accounts for patient-specific factors. To inform the guidance, the author incorporates and refines perspectives from treatment guidelines already written by clinical professional organizations. The author also briefly reviews the relatively new quantitative systematic review methodology of network meta-analysis (NMA) and discusses how NMA may help guide pharmacologic treatment sequencing decisions in the future by way of ranking treatments according to effect size and the relative amount of study to which treatments have been subject. Caveats of NMA studies are briefly discussed, as are results of recent NMAs regarding the pharmacologic treatment of anxiety disorders.
在本综述中,作者审视了来自临床试验的、针对成人广泛性焦虑障碍、惊恐障碍和社交焦虑障碍的心理药物治疗证据。对于每种障碍,作者回顾了主要的药物类别,然后讨论了每类中的循证药物。作者还回顾了每种药物或药物类别的关键安全性和耐受性考量因素。大多数特定药物的循证剂量显示在一个综合参考表中。随后,作者综合现有信息,提出一种务实的、考虑患者特定因素的逐步治疗方法。为了为该指南提供信息,作者纳入并完善了临床专业组织已编写的治疗指南中的观点。作者还简要回顾了相对较新的网络荟萃分析(NMA)定量系统评价方法,并讨论了NMA如何通过根据效应大小和各治疗方法的研究相对数量对治疗方法进行排序,在未来帮助指导药物治疗顺序决策。文中简要讨论了NMA研究的注意事项,以及近期关于焦虑障碍药物治疗的NMA结果。