Shiuey Eric J, Fox Yehuda, Kurnick Adam, Rachmiel Rony, Kurtz Shimon, Waisbourd Michael
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Oct 18;15:2335-2341. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S330682. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient interest and willingness to pay (WTP) for teleophthalmology services, whose benefits include improved healthcare access and potential cost savings.
Cross-sectional study of 215 patients attending a single tertiary center to assess their interest in teleophthalmology. Comparisons between those interested and those not interested were conducted; logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of price on interest.
Two thirds (66.5%) of patients were interested in teleophthalmology instead of in-person clinic visits. Those interested were significantly younger than uninterested patients (48.8±22.7 vs 62.4±18.3 years) and were more likely to miss work to attend clinic, own both a computer and smartphone, have experience with video conferencing, and use the internet frequently (all P<0.05). Interested patients were also more likely to indicate time and cost savings, as well as improved follow-up testing, compared to uninterested patients (both P<0.001). Overall, 70.4% of interested patients expressed WTP out-of-pocket for teleservices, especially at low (<$14 US dollars) and moderate-high (>$28) price points. Higher level of education was associated with WTP (OR=2.31, 95% CI 1.05-5.06; P=0.037).
Most patients were interested in teleophthalmology services, especially if they were young, would otherwise miss work, and were familiar with electronics, video conferencing, and internet use. Most interested patients expressed WTP out-of-pocket. Targeting factors related to teleophthalmology interest may increase patient use and enhance communication, thereby improving healthcare access and follow-up.
本研究旨在评估患者对远程眼科服务的兴趣及支付意愿(WTP),该服务的益处包括改善医疗服务可及性及潜在成本节约。
对一家三级中心的215名患者进行横断面研究,以评估他们对远程眼科的兴趣。对感兴趣者和不感兴趣者进行比较;采用逻辑回归评估价格对兴趣的影响。
三分之二(66.5%)的患者对远程眼科服务感兴趣,而非亲自到门诊就诊。感兴趣的患者明显比不感兴趣的患者年轻(48.8±22.7岁 vs 62.4±18.3岁),且更有可能为看病而误工,拥有电脑和智能手机,有视频会议经验,且经常使用互联网(所有P<0.05)。与不感兴趣的患者相比,感兴趣的患者也更有可能表示节省了时间和成本,以及改善了随访检查(均P<0.001)。总体而言,70.4%的感兴趣患者表示愿意自掏腰包支付远程服务费用,尤其是在低价(<14美元)和中高价(>28美元)价位。较高的教育水平与支付意愿相关(OR=2.31,95%CI 1.05-5.06;P=0.037)。
大多数患者对远程眼科服务感兴趣,如果他们年轻、否则会误工,且熟悉电子设备、视频会议和互联网使用则更是如此。大多数感兴趣的患者表示愿意自掏腰包支付费用。针对与远程眼科兴趣相关的因素可能会增加患者的使用并加强沟通,从而改善医疗服务可及性和随访情况。