Kavanagh Matthew M, Norato Laura, Friedman Eric A, Armbrister Adria N
Departamento de Salud Internacional Universidad de Georgetow Washington D.C. Estados Unidos de América Departamento de Salud Internacional, Universidad de Georgetown, Washington, D.C., Estados Unidos de América.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud Washington, D.C. Estados Unidos de América Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, D.C., Estados Unidos de América.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Nov 3;45:e106. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.106. eCollection 2021.
There is growing recognition that health and well-being improvements have not been shared across populations in the Americas. This article analyzes 32 national health sector policies, strategies, and plans across 10 different areas of health equity to understand, from one perspective, how equity is being addressed in the region. It finds significant variation in the substance and structure of how the health plans handle the issue. Nearly all countries explicitly include health equity as a clear goal, and most address the social determinants of health. Participatory processes documented in the development of these plans range from none to extensive and robust. Substantive equity-focused policies, such as those to improve physical accessibility of health care and increase affordable access to medicines, are included in many plans, though no country includes all aspects examined. Countries identify marginalized populations in their plans, though only a quarter specifically identify Afro-descendants and more than half do not address Indigenous people, including countries with large Indigenous populations. Four include attention to migrants. Despite health equity goals and data on baseline inequities, fewer than half of countries include time-bound targets on reducing absolute or relative health inequalities. Clear accountability mechanisms such as education, reporting, or rights-enforcement mechanisms in plans are rare. The nearly unanimous commitment across countries of the Americas to equity in health provides an important opportunity. Learning from the most robust equity-focused plans could provide a road map for efforts to translate broad goals into time-bound targets and eventually to increasing equity.
人们越来越认识到,美洲各人群并未平等地享受到健康和福祉的改善。本文分析了32项国家卫生部门政策、战略和计划,涉及10个不同的卫生公平领域,从一个角度来了解该地区如何处理公平问题。研究发现,这些卫生计划在处理该问题的实质内容和结构方面存在显著差异。几乎所有国家都明确将卫生公平作为一项明确目标,且大多数国家都涉及健康的社会决定因素。这些计划制定过程中的参与性程序从没有到广泛而有力不等。许多计划都纳入了以公平为重点的实质性政策,比如改善医疗服务物理可及性以及增加药品可负担性的政策,不过没有一个国家涵盖了所有审查的方面。各国在其计划中确定了边缘化人群,然而只有四分之一的国家明确指出了非洲裔后代,超过一半的国家没有提及原住民,包括拥有大量原住民人口的国家。有四个国家关注了移民问题。尽管有卫生公平目标以及关于基线不平等的数据,但不到一半的国家设定了减少绝对或相对健康不平等的有时限目标。计划中诸如教育、报告或权利执行机制等明确的问责机制很少见。美洲各国对卫生公平几乎一致的承诺提供了一个重要机遇。借鉴最有力的以公平为重点的计划可为将广泛目标转化为有时限目标并最终实现更大公平的努力提供路线图。