Jung Lindsey, Miske Abby, Indorf Amy, Nelson Kate, Gadi Vijayakrishna K, Banda Kalyan
Department of Pharmacy Services, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA 98109.
Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA 98195.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Apr;22(3):e310-e318. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Anthracycline and taxane-based doublets have largely replaced cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) as preferred regimens in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Metronomic CMF is associated with improved tolerability over anthracycline or taxane-based regimens. Previously, there have been no direct comparisons between taxane-based regimens and CMF.
We performed a retrospective review of 98 breast cancer patients treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance from February 2015 through December 2018 that received either metronomic CMF or docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) as adjuvant therapy for early-stage, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. The primary outcome assessed was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), dose intensity, and adverse effects.
With an average follow-up of 35.9 and 28.2 months for CMF and TC, respectively, there was no significant difference in DFS or OS between the chemotherapy regimens. DFS at 3 years was 96.7% vs. 94.3% and OS 96.7% vs. 100% for CMF and TC, respectively. There were more dose delays in the CMF group, but on average, patients receiving either regimen achieved a dose intensity ≥85%. There was a trend towards increased hospitalization or emergency department utilization (23.1% vs. 10.6%) and Grade 4 toxicities (9.6% vs. 4.3%) with TC vs. CMF.
Metronomic CMF offers equivalent survival outcomes to TC and remains a viable option in the adjuvant treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer. There was a trend towards increased Grade 4 toxicities and hospitalizations with TC, suggesting that metronomic CMF may offer a more tolerable treatment option while maintaining excellent disease outcomes.
基于蒽环类药物和紫杉烷的双联化疗方案在很大程度上已取代环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶(CMF),成为乳腺癌辅助治疗的首选方案。与基于蒽环类药物或紫杉烷的方案相比,节拍性CMF的耐受性更好。此前,基于紫杉烷的方案与CMF之间尚未进行过直接比较。
我们对2015年2月至2018年12月在西雅图癌症护理联盟接受治疗的98例乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者接受节拍性CMF或多西他赛与环磷酰胺(TC)作为早期激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)乳腺癌的辅助治疗。评估的主要结局是无病生存期(DFS)。次要结局包括总生存期(OS)、剂量强度和不良反应。
CMF组和TC组的平均随访时间分别为35.9个月和28.2个月,两种化疗方案的DFS或OS无显著差异。CMF组和TC组3年时的DFS分别为96.7%和94.3%,OS分别为96.7%和100%。CMF组的剂量延迟更多,但平均而言,接受任何一种方案的患者的剂量强度均≥85%。与CMF相比,TC组有住院或急诊就诊增加(23.1%对10.6%)和4级毒性增加(9.6%对4.3%)的趋势。
节拍性CMF与TC的生存结局相当,仍是HR+/HER2-乳腺癌辅助治疗的可行选择。TC组有4级毒性和住院增加的趋势,这表明节拍性CMF在维持良好疾病结局的同时可能提供更可耐受的治疗选择。