Patience Aimie, Steultjens Martijn P, Hendry Gordon J
Musculoskeletal Health Research Group, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021 Nov 5;5(Suppl 2):ii19-ii34. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab056. eCollection 2021 Nov.
The objectives were to evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of ultrasound (US) studies of Achilles enthesitis in people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), to identify the definitions and scoring systems adopted and to estimate the prevalence of ultrasound features of Achilles enthesitis in this population.
A systematic literature review was conducted using the AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies had to measure US features of Achilles enthesitis in people with PsA. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black Quality Index tool. US protocol reporting was assessed using a checklist informed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the reporting of US studies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.
Fifteen studies were included. One study was scored as high methodological quality, 9 as moderate and 5 as low. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the prevalence, descriptions, scoring of features and quality of US protocol reporting. Prevalence estimates (% of entheses) reported included hypoechogenicity [mean 5.9% (s.d. 0.9)], increased thickness [mean 22.1% (s.d. 12.2)], erosions [mean 3.3% (s.d. 2.5)], calcifications [mean 42.6% (s.d. 15.6)], enthesophytes [mean 41.3% (s.d. 15.6)] and Doppler signal [mean 11.8% (s.d. 10.1)].
The review highlighted significant variations in prevalence figures that could potentially be explained by the range of definitions and scoring criteria available, but also due to the inconsistent reporting of US protocols. Uptake of the EULAR recommendations and using the latest definitions and validated scoring criteria would allow for a better understanding of the frequency and severity of individual features of pathology.
本研究旨在评估银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者跟腱附着点炎超声(US)研究的方法学质量和报告质量,确定所采用的定义和评分系统,并估计该人群跟腱附着点炎超声特征的患病率。
使用AMED、CINAHL、MEDLINE、ProQuest和Web of Science数据库进行系统的文献综述。符合条件的研究必须测量PsA患者跟腱附着点炎的超声特征。使用改良的唐斯和布莱克质量指数工具评估方法学质量。根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)关于风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病超声研究报告的建议制定的清单评估超声检查方案报告。
纳入15项研究。1项研究的方法学质量被评为高,9项为中等,5项为低。在患病率、特征描述、特征评分和超声检查方案报告质量方面观察到显著异质性。报告的患病率估计值(附着点的百分比)包括低回声[平均5.9%(标准差0.9)]、厚度增加[平均22.1%(标准差12.2)]、侵蚀[平均3.3%(标准差2.5)]、钙化[平均42.6%(标准差15.6)]、骨赘[平均41.3%(标准差15.6)]和多普勒信号[平均11.8%(标准差10.1)]。
该综述强调了患病率数据的显著差异,这可能是由于可用的定义和评分标准范围不同,但也由于超声检查方案报告不一致。采用EULAR建议并使用最新定义和经过验证的评分标准将有助于更好地了解病理个体特征的频率和严重程度。