Lasselin Julie
Stress Research Institute, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021 Oct 24;18:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100379. eCollection 2021 Dec.
What do we know about sickness behavior? In this article, I guide you through some of the complexity of sickness behavior occurring after an immune challenge. I highlight the many features of behavioral and affective changes induced during experimental endotoxemia in humans, and describe how little we know about many of these features. I argue that we need to dismantle the components of inflammation-induced sickness behavior, and study each component in detail. I also point out the large inter-individual differences in inflammation-induced behavioral and affective changes, and the fact that psychosocial factors likely interact with inflammation to shape inflammation-induced sickness behavior. PNI clearly lacks investigations of the vulnerability and resilient factors underlying the inter-individual variability in sickness behavior. Throughout the article, I base my argument on my published articles, and provide concrete examples from my experience and the data that I have collected over the past 10 years. Given the relevance of inflammation-induced sickness behavior for inflammation-associated depression and for how people react to infections, I encourage current and future psychoneuroimmunologists to return towards basic science of sickness behavior.
我们对疾病行为了解多少?在本文中,我将引导您了解免疫挑战后出现的疾病行为的一些复杂性。我强调了人类实验性内毒素血症期间诱导的行为和情感变化的许多特征,并描述了我们对这些特征中许多方面的了解是多么有限。我认为我们需要拆解炎症诱导的疾病行为的组成部分,并详细研究每个组成部分。我还指出了炎症诱导的行为和情感变化中存在的个体间巨大差异,以及心理社会因素可能与炎症相互作用以塑造炎症诱导的疾病行为这一事实。身心神经免疫学显然缺乏对疾病行为个体间变异性背后的脆弱性和复原力因素的研究。在整篇文章中,我的论点基于我已发表的文章,并从我过去10年的经验和收集的数据中提供具体例子。鉴于炎症诱导的疾病行为与炎症相关抑郁症以及人们对感染的反应的相关性,我鼓励当前和未来的身心神经免疫学家回归到疾病行为的基础科学研究。