School of Dentistry, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XY, United Kingdom; Centre for Oral, Clinical &Translational Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Centre for Oral, Clinical &Translational Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103879. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103879. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
To determine if superimposition of sequential scans can discriminate between different fluorides at step heights less than 5 μm on natural human enamel surfaces.
Natural, unpolished, human enamel specimens (n = 60) were randomly assigned to one of three pre-treatment toothpaste slurries with a calcium silicate/fluoride, fluoride-only and a control. Baseline and post treatment scans, from a non-contacting profilometer with a 0.01 μm z-axis and <1 μm lateral scanning resolution were imported into superimposition software to define change in mean 3D step height and surface roughness following erosion in 0.3% citric acid for 15 min. Statistical analysis conducted with two-way repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons.
Confidence and resolution of superimposition and subtraction of repeated profiles from unpolished enamel revealed accuracy within 1-2 μm. The technique was able to discriminate between the fluorides demonstrating statistical differences in mean (SD) 3D step height (μm) of 1.96 (0.40) and 2.75 (0.49) (p = 0.0024). There was a statistically significant increase in surface roughness for all groups after 15 min erosion compared to baseline. But no statistically significant difference between the interventions after 15 min erosion but there was compared to no fluoride (p = 0.006).
Superimposition and subtraction of profiles could discriminate between fluoride interventions, which showed statistical differences in enamel loss differences less than 3 μm.
This erosion model and data analysis workflow was able to distinguish differences between scans of 3 μm on unpolished enamel following the interaction with fluoride.
确定在自然人类牙釉质表面,层间高度小于 5μm 的情况下,连续扫描的叠加是否可以区分不同的氟化物。
将 60 个天然、未经抛光的人类牙釉质标本随机分配到三种预处理牙膏浆料中的一种,分别为硅酸钙/氟化物、氟化物和对照组。用具有 0.01μm z 轴和 <1μm 横向扫描分辨率的非接触式轮廓仪对基线和处理后扫描进行扫描,然后将扫描结果导入叠加软件,以定义在 0.3%柠檬酸中腐蚀 15 分钟后平均 3D 台阶高度和表面粗糙度的变化。采用双向重复测量方差分析和事后 Tukey 多重比较进行统计分析。
未经抛光牙釉质上重复轮廓的叠加和减法的置信度和分辨率表明,精度在 1-2μm 之间。该技术能够区分氟化物,在平均(SD)3D 台阶高度(μm)上显示出统计学差异,分别为 1.96(0.40)和 2.75(0.49)(p=0.0024)。与基线相比,所有组在 15 分钟腐蚀后表面粗糙度均显著增加。但在 15 分钟腐蚀后,各组之间的干预无统计学差异,但与无氟化物相比有统计学差异(p=0.006)。
叠加和减法可以区分氟化物干预措施,在牙釉质损失差异小于 3μm 的情况下,这些干预措施显示出统计学差异。
这种侵蚀模型和数据分析工作流程能够在与氟化物相互作用后,区分未经抛光牙釉质上 3μm 扫描之间的差异。