The value of having an initial word recognition score for a precise prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE

Although the hearing thresholds of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) closely relate to the prognosis that results in progressive floor effects, many studies have usually used hearing thresholds as the main outcome of the measurement of prognostic factors. The present study aimed to identify the prognostic factors related to initial hearing tests and speculates the effects of word recognition score (WRS) on the prognoses for patients with ISSNHL.

METHODS

Between March 2011 and November 2020, we retrospectively reviewed chart profiles of 2,636 ISSNHL patients. The 180 patients who met the inclusion criteria were asked to participate in the present study. Based on their initial WRS, all these patients were divided into good WRS (GW) and poor WRS (PW) groups with 52% as the cut-off points. Demographic, clinical, and audiological variables, such as age, onset time, duration of treatment, gender, ear side, comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tinnitus, dizziness), hearing configuration (i.e., ascending, descending, flat, irregular, and profound), treatment options (i.e., systemic corticosteroid therapy per oral, intratympanic steroid injection, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy), and WRS were analyzed as being underlying prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significantly different distributions for hearing thresholds and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as general characteristics. The results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) of age (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.59 - 24.25), duration of treatment (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96 - 1.00), ascending configuration (OR: 4.97, 95% CI: 1.64 - 16.62), irregular configuration (OR: 4.58, 95% CI: 1.62 - 13.79), and WRS (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00 - 1.02) were the significant prognostic factors for all the patients. Further analysis of those patients with WRS under 52% cut-off points showed that an ascending configuration (OR: 5.87, 95% CI: 1.18 - 35.99), irregular configuration (OR: 8.03, 95% CI: 1.69 - 46.30), and WRS (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.10) significantly affected the prognosis. As the initial WRS of ISSNHL patients decreased, the OR of the WRS itself increased. These results suggested that the importance of WRS as the prognostic factor was stressed for PW patients.

CONCLUSION

The age, duration of treatment, initial hearing configuration (ascending and irregular types), and WRS were the significant prognostic factors for patients with ISSNHL. It was learned that WRS could be a remarkable prognostic factor to consider, especially for ISSNHL patients with poor WRS.