Heckman Luuk, Luermans Justin, Salden Floor, van Stipdonk Antonius Martinus Wilhelmus, Mafi-Rad Masih, Prinzen Frits, Vernooy Kevin
Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), the Netherlands.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021 Oct;10(3):165-171. doi: 10.15420/aer.2021.21.
Left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) have been introduced to maintain or correct interventricular and intraventricular (dys)synchrony. LVSP is hypothesised to produce a fairly physiological sequence of activation, since in the left ventricle (LV) the working myocardium is activated first at the LV endocardium in the low septal and anterior free-wall regions. Animal studies as well as patient studies have demonstrated that LV function is maintained during LVSP at levels comparable to sinus rhythm with normal conduction. Left ventricular activation is more synchronous during LBBP than LVSP, but LBBP produces a higher level of intraventricular dyssynchrony compared to LVSP. While LVSP is fairly straightforward to perform, targeting the left bundle branch area may be more challenging. Long-term effects of LVSP and LBBP are yet to be determined. This review focuses on the physiology and practicality of LVSP and provides a guide for permanent LVSP implantation.
左心室间隔起搏(LVSP)和左束支起搏(LBBP)已被引入以维持或纠正心室间和心室内(不同步)同步。LVSP被假设能产生相当生理性的激动顺序,因为在左心室(LV)中,工作心肌首先在低位间隔和前游离壁区域的LV心内膜被激活。动物研究以及患者研究均表明,在LVSP期间LV功能维持在与正常传导的窦性心律相当的水平。与LVSP相比,LBBP期间左心室激动更同步,但与LVSP相比,LBBP产生更高水平的心室内不同步。虽然LVSP操作相当简单,但靶向左束支区域可能更具挑战性。LVSP和LBBP的长期影响尚待确定。本综述重点关注LVSP的生理学和实用性,并为永久性LVSP植入提供指导。