Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Mar 23;43(2):315-322. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab221.
The Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale is a validated rapid assessment of frailty phenotype and predictor of mortality in the geriatric population. Using data from a large tertiary care burn center, we assessed the association between admission frailty in an elderly burn population and inpatient outcomes. This was a retrospective analysis of burn patients ≥65 years from 2015 to 2019. Patients were assigned to frailty subgroups based on comprehensive medical, social work, and therapy assessments. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate associations between admission frailty and 30-day inpatient mortality. Our study included 644 patients (low frailty: 262, moderate frailty: 345, and high frailty: 37). Frailty was associated with higher median TBSA and age at admission. The 30-day cumulative incidence of mortality was 2.3%, 7.0%, and 24.3% among the low, moderate, and high frailty strata, respectively. After adjustment for age, TBSA, and inhalation injury, high frailty was associated with increased 30-day mortality, compared to low (hazard ratio 5.73; 95% confidence interval 1.86, 17.62). Moderate frailty also appeared to increase 30-day mortality, although estimates were imprecise (hazard ratio 2.19; 95% confidence interval 0.87-5.50). High frailty was associated with increased morbidity and healthcare utilization, including need for intensive care stay (68% vs 37% and 21%, P < .001) and rehab or care facility at discharge (41% vs 25% and 6%, P < .001), compared to moderate and low frailty subgroups. Our findings emphasize the need to consider preinjury physiological state and the increased risk of death and morbidity in the elderly burn population.
罗克伍德临床虚弱量表是一种经过验证的快速评估虚弱表型的方法,也是老年人群死亡率的预测指标。我们利用大型三级烧伤中心的数据,评估了老年烧伤人群入院时的虚弱程度与住院期间结局的相关性。这是一项对 2015 年至 2019 年≥65 岁烧伤患者的回顾性分析。根据全面的医学、社会工作和治疗评估,将患者分为虚弱亚组。使用 Cox 比例风险回归估计入院时的虚弱程度与 30 天住院死亡率之间的关联。我们的研究包括 644 名患者(低虚弱组:262 名,中度虚弱组:345 名,高虚弱组:37 名)。虚弱与更高的中位 TBSA 和入院时的年龄相关。低、中、高虚弱组的 30 天死亡率分别为 2.3%、7.0%和 24.3%。在调整年龄、TBSA 和吸入性损伤后,与低虚弱组相比,高虚弱组的 30 天死亡率更高(风险比 5.73;95%置信区间 1.86-17.62)。中度虚弱似乎也增加了 30 天的死亡率,尽管估计不太准确(风险比 2.19;95%置信区间 0.87-5.50)。与中、低虚弱亚组相比,高虚弱组与发病率和医疗保健利用率增加相关,包括需要重症监护(68%比 37%和 21%,P <.001)和出院时康复或护理机构(41%比 25%和 6%,P <.001)。我们的研究结果强调需要考虑受伤前的生理状态以及老年烧伤人群死亡和发病率增加的风险。