Suppr超能文献

U SO CARE——心肺复苏期间心脏超声的影响:一项基于模拟人试验的前瞻性随机试验。

U SO CARE-The Impact of Cardiac Ultrasound during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial.

作者信息

Zöllner Karim, Sellmann Timur, Wetzchewald Dietmar, Schwager Heidrun, Cleff Corvin, Thal Serge C, Marsch Stephan

机构信息

Institution for Emergency Medicine, 59755 Arnsberg, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Bethesda Hospital, 47053 Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 9;10(22):5218. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225218.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS); however, data on POCUS during CPR are sparse and conflicting. This randomized trial investigated the effects of POCUS during CPR on team performance and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine residents performed CPR with or without available POCUS in simulated cardiac arrests. The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Data analysis was performed using video recordings.

RESULTS

Hands-on time was 89% (87-91) in the POCUS and 92% (89-94) in the control group (difference 3, 95% CI for difference 2-4, < 0.001). POCUS teams had delayed defibrillator attachments (33 vs. 26 sec, = 0.017) and first rhythm analysis (74 vs. 52 sec, = 0.001). Available POCUS was used in 71%. Of the POCUS teams, 3 stated a POCUS-derived diagnosis, with 49 being correct and 42 followed by a correct treatment decision. Four teams made a wrong diagnosis and two made an inappropriate treatment decision.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS during CPR resulted in lower hands-on times and delayed rhythm analysis. Correct POCUS diagnoses occurred in 52%, correct treatment decisions in 44%, and inappropriate treatment decisions in 2%. Training on POCUS during CPR should focus on diagnostic accuracy and maintenance of high-quality CPR.

摘要

背景

实际的心肺复苏(CPR)指南推荐使用床旁超声(POCUS);然而,关于CPR期间POCUS的数据稀少且相互矛盾。这项随机试验研究了CPR期间POCUS对团队表现和诊断准确性的影响。

方法

重症监护和急诊医学住院医师在模拟心脏骤停时进行有或没有可用POCUS的CPR。主要终点是实际操作时间。使用录像进行数据分析。

结果

POCUS组的实际操作时间为89%(87-91),对照组为92%(89-94)(差异为3,差异的95%CI为2-4,<0.001)。POCUS组延迟了除颤器连接(33秒对26秒,P=0.017)和首次心律分析(74秒对52秒,P=0.001)。71%的情况使用了可用的POCUS。在POCUS组中,3个团队做出了基于POCUS的诊断,其中49个正确,42个随后做出了正确的治疗决定。4个团队做出了错误诊断,2个做出了不适当的治疗决定。

结论

CPR期间使用POCUS导致实际操作时间缩短和心律分析延迟。POCUS正确诊断率为52%,正确治疗决定率为44%,不适当治疗决定率为2%。CPR期间POCUS培训应侧重于诊断准确性和维持高质量CPR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验