Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;18(22):11806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211806.
Virtual reality (VR) can present advantages in the treatment of chronic low back pain. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the effectiveness of VR in chronic low back pain. This review was designed according to PRISMA and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020222129). Four databases (PubMed, Cinahl, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched up to August 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined following PICOS recommendations. Methodological quality was assessed with the Downs and Black scale and the risk of bias with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review and eleven in the meta-analysis. Significant differences were found in favor of VR compared to no VR in pain intensity postintervention (11 trials; = 569; SMD = -1.92; 95% CI = -2.73, -1.11; < 0.00001) and followup (4 trials; = 240; SDM = -6.34; 95% CI = -9.12, -3.56; < 0.00001); and kinesiophobia postintervention (3 trials; = 192; MD = -8.96; 95% CI = -17.52, -0.40; = 0.04) and followup (2 trials; = 149; MD = -12.04; 95% CI = -20.58, -3.49; = 0.006). No significant differences were found in disability. In conclusion, VR can significantly reduce pain intensity and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain after the intervention and at followup. However, high heterogeneity exists and can influence the consistency of the results.
虚拟现实 (VR) 在慢性下腰痛治疗中具有优势。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是分析 VR 在慢性下腰痛中的疗效。本综述根据 PRISMA 设计,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42020222129)中注册。截至 2021 年 8 月,检索了 4 个数据库(PubMed、Cinahl、Scopus、Web of Science)。纳入标准遵循 PICOS 建议制定。使用 Downs 和 Black 量表评估方法学质量,使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。系统评价纳入了 14 项研究,荟萃分析纳入了 11 项研究。与无 VR 相比,VR 在干预后(11 项试验; = 569;SMD = -1.92;95%CI = -2.73, -1.11; < 0.00001)和随访时(4 项试验; = 240;SMD = -6.34;95%CI = -9.12, -3.56; < 0.00001)的疼痛强度、干预后(3 项试验; = 192;MD = -8.96;95%CI = -17.52, -0.40; = 0.04)和随访时(2 项试验; = 149;MD = -12.04;95%CI = -20.58, -3.49; = 0.006)的恐动症方面存在显著差异。在残疾方面未发现显著差异。总之,VR 可显著降低慢性下腰痛患者干预后和随访时的疼痛强度和恐动症。然而,存在高度异质性,可能影响结果的一致性。