Suppr超能文献

测量医疗保健专业人员的 COVID-19 相关健康素养- HL-COV-HP 工具的心理计量学评估。

Measuring COVID-19 Related Health Literacy in Healthcare Professionals-Psychometric Evaluation of the HL-COV-HP Instrument.

机构信息

Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 14;18(22):11959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211959.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thus far, there is no instrument available measuring COVID-19 related health literacy of healthcare professionals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an instrument assessing COVID-19 related health literacy in healthcare professionals (HL-COV-HP) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

An exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis, and descriptive analyses were conducted using data from = 965 healthcare professionals. Health literacy related to COVID-19 was measured with 12 items, which were adapted from the validated HLS-EU-Q16 instrument measuring general health literacy.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that 12 items loaded on one component. After removing one item due to its high standardized residual covariance, the confirmatory factor analysis of a one-factor model with 11 items showed satisfactory model fit (χ = 199.340, df = 41, χ/df = 4.862, < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.063, CFI = 0.963 and TLI = 0.951). The HL-COV-HP instrument showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.87) and acceptable construct reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The HL-COV-HP is a reliable, valid, and feasible instrument to assess the COVID-19 related health literacy in healthcare professionals. It can be used in hospitals or other healt hcare settings to assess the motivation and ability of healthcare professionals to find, understand, evaluate, and use COVID-19 information.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,尚无用于测量医护人员 COVID-19 相关健康素养的工具。因此,本研究旨在开发一种评估医护人员 COVID-19 相关健康素养的工具(HL-COV-HP),并评估其心理测量学特性。

方法

使用来自 = 965 名医护人员的数据进行探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析和描述性分析。与 COVID-19 相关的健康素养使用 12 个项目进行测量,这些项目改编自经过验证的 HLS-EU-Q16 工具,用于测量一般健康素养。

结果

探索性因子分析表明,12 个项目可加载到一个组件上。由于标准残差协方差较高,删除一个项目后,具有 11 个项目的单因素模型的验证性因子分析显示出良好的模型拟合度(χ = 199.340,df = 41,χ/df = 4.862, < 0.001,RMSEA = 0.063,CFI = 0.963 和 TLI = 0.951)。HL-COV-HP 工具具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha 0.87)和可接受的结构可靠性。

结论

HL-COV-HP 是一种可靠、有效且可行的工具,可用于评估医护人员的 COVID-19 相关健康素养。它可以在医院或其他医疗保健环境中使用,以评估医护人员寻找、理解、评估和使用 COVID-19 信息的动机和能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3561/8624823/893f036a7df9/ijerph-18-11959-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring COVID-19 Related Health Literacy in Healthcare Professionals-Psychometric Evaluation of the HL-COV-HP Instrument.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 14;18(22):11959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211959.
2
Development of a health literacy scale for COVID-19 prevention among pregnant women in Thailand.
Trop Med Int Health. 2024 Oct;29(10):895-903. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14048. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Psychometric Validation of the Translated and Adapted Bengali Version of the HLS-EU-Q16/Q6 for Adults.
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241248132. doi: 10.1177/00469580241248132.
8

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19-Related Health Literacy of School Leaders in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;19(19):12790. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912790.
3
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and Validation of the COVID-19 Knowledges and Behavior Questionnaire in a French Population (CoVQuest-CC).
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052569.

本文引用的文献

3
Evaluation of Israeli healthcare workers knowledge and attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine.
Public Health Nurs. 2022 Mar;39(2):415-422. doi: 10.1111/phn.12987. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
[Vaccination willingness against COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Germany : Results from a University Medicine Network survey between November 2020 and January 2021].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):74-85. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03418-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Australian critical care nurses' knowledge, preparedness, and experiences of managing SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19 pandemic.
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Jan;35(1):22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验