Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212101.
Several empirical studies have shown an association between informal caregiving for adults and loneliness or social isolation. Nevertheless, a systematic review is lacking synthesizing studies which have investigated these aforementioned associations. Therefore, our purpose was to give an overview of the existing evidence from observational studies. Three electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL) were searched in June 2021. Observational studies investigating the association between informal caregiving for adults and loneliness or social isolation were included. In contrast, studies examining grandchild care or private care for chronically ill children were excluded. Data extractions covered study design, assessment of informal caregiving, loneliness and social isolation, the characteristics of the sample, the analytical approach and key findings. Study quality was assessed based on the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Each step (study selection, data extraction and evaluation of study quality) was conducted by two reviewers. In sum, twelve studies were included in our review (seven cross-sectional studies and five longitudinal studies)-all included studies were either from North America or Europe. The studies mainly showed an association between providing informal care and higher loneliness levels. The overall study quality was fair to good. : Our systematic review mainly identified associations between providing informal care and higher loneliness levels. This is of great importance in assisting informal caregivers in avoiding loneliness, since it is associated with subsequent morbidity and mortality. Moreover, high loneliness levels of informal caregivers may have adverse consequences for informal care recipients.
已有几项实证研究表明,成年人的非正式护理与孤独或社会隔离之间存在关联。然而,目前缺乏对这些关联进行综合研究的系统综述。因此,我们的目的是概述观察性研究中现有的证据。我们于 2021 年 6 月在三个电子数据库(Medline、PsycINFO、CINAHL)中进行了检索。纳入了研究成年人的非正式护理与孤独或社会隔离之间关联的观察性研究。相反,排除了研究祖孙照顾或为慢性疾病儿童提供私人护理的研究。数据提取涵盖了研究设计、非正式护理评估、孤独和社会隔离、样本特征、分析方法和主要发现。研究质量基于 NIH 对观察性队列和横断面研究的质量评估工具进行评估。每一步(研究选择、数据提取和研究质量评估)均由两名评审员进行。总之,我们的综述纳入了 12 项研究(7 项横断面研究和 5 项纵向研究),所有纳入的研究均来自北美或欧洲。这些研究主要表明提供非正式护理与更高的孤独感水平之间存在关联。总体研究质量为中等至良好。我们的系统综述主要确定了提供非正式护理与更高孤独感水平之间的关联。这对于帮助非正式护理人员避免孤独感非常重要,因为孤独感与随后的发病率和死亡率有关。此外,非正式护理人员的高孤独感水平可能会对非正式护理接受者产生不利影响。