Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(4):429-444. doi: 10.1037/xan0000300.
Given a choice, pigeons prefer an initial-link stimulus that is followed by reliable signals that food will be delivered (S+) or not (S-) after a delay, over an alternative initial-link stimulus that is followed by unreliable signals of food, even when the former yields a lower overall probability of food. This suboptimal preference has been attributed to the combination of a biased attraction to the S+ and ignoring the S-. We evaluated the inhibitory properties of the S- in three experiments to investigate its role in suboptimal choice. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained in an autoshaping procedure with the four terminal link stimuli of the suboptimal choice task; S+ was continuously reinforced, S3 and S4 were each partially reinforced on a 50% schedule, and S- was never reinforced. Summation tests showed that S- acquired inhibitory properties during training. Experiment 2 replicated the summation tests after training on the full suboptimal choice procedure and found that S- inhibition was not attributable to external inhibition. In Experiment 3, pigeons were trained on the suboptimal choice procedure and the development of inhibition was assessed throughout training. An analysis of individual differences across birds revealed that the response rates to S- were negatively correlated with the strength of suboptimal preference, both within subject as each bird acquired suboptimal preference, and across subjects once all birds had reached asymptotic levels of suboptimal preference. Thus, rather than ignoring the S-, we found evidence that birds attended to S- as an inhibitory stimulus. Future models explaining performance in the suboptimal choice task should consider inhibition to the S- as a factor in suboptimal choice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
如果可以选择,鸽子更喜欢初始链接刺激,这种刺激之后会跟着可靠的信号,提示在延迟后会有食物(S+)或没有食物(S-);而不是跟着不可靠的食物信号的另一个初始链接刺激,即使前者产生的食物总体概率较低。这种次优偏好归因于对 S+的偏向吸引力和对 S-的忽略的结合。我们在三个实验中评估了 S-的抑制特性,以研究其在次优选择中的作用。在实验 1 中,鸽子在一个自动成形程序中接受了次优选择任务的四个终端链接刺激的训练;S+连续强化,S3 和 S4 分别按照 50%的时间表部分强化,S-从不强化。加和测试表明,S-在训练期间获得了抑制特性。实验 2 在完成次优选择程序的训练后复制了加和测试,发现 S-的抑制不是由于外部抑制造成的。在实验 3 中,鸽子在次优选择程序上接受了训练,并在整个训练过程中评估了抑制的发展。对不同鸟类个体差异的分析表明,S-的反应率与次优偏好的强度呈负相关,这在每个鸟类获得次优偏好的过程中是内部相关的,并且在所有鸟类达到次优偏好的渐近水平后,也是跨主体相关的。因此,我们发现,鸟类并没有忽视 S-,而是将其视为一种抑制性刺激。未来解释次优选择任务表现的模型应该将对 S-的抑制视为次优选择的一个因素。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。