Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Feb;126:104957. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104957. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
Femoral fractures from sideways falls in the elderly are associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Approaches to prevent these catastrophic injuries include pharmacological treatments, which have limited efficacy. Prophylactic femoral augmentation systems are a promising alternative that are gaining prominence by addressing the most debilitating osteoporosis-related fracture. We have developed finite element models (FEMs) of a novel experimental sideways fall simulator for cadavers. By virtue of the range of specimens and injury outcomes, these FEMs are well-suited to the evaluation of such implants. The purpose of this study was to use the FEMs to evaluate the mechanical effectiveness of three different prophylactic femoral augmentation systems. Models of the Y-Strut® (Hyprevention®, Pessac, France), Gamma Nail® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA), and a simple lag screw femoral fracture implant systems were placed into FEMs of five cadaveric pelvis-femur constructs embedded in a soft tissue surrogate, which were then subject to simulated sideways falls at seven impact velocities. Femur-only FEMs were also evaluated. Peak impact forces and peak acetabular forces were examined, and failure was evaluated using a strain-based criterion. We found that the femoral augmentation systems increased the peak forces prior to fracture, but were unable to prevent fracture for severe impacts. The Gamma Nail® system consistently produced the largest strength increases relative to the unaugmented femur for all five specimens in both the pendulum-drop FEMs and the femur-only simulations. In some cases, the same implant appeared to cause fractures in the acetabulum. The femur-only FEMs showed larger force increases than the pendulum-drop simulations, which suggests that the results of the femur-only simulations may not represent sideways falls as accurately as the soft tissue-embedded pendulum-drop simulations. The results from this study demonstrate the ability to simulate a high energy phenomenon and the effect of implants in an in silico environment. The results also suggest that implants could increase the force applied to the proximal femur during impact. Fracture outcomes from the tested implants can be used to inform the design of future devices, which reaffirms the value of modelling with biofidelic considerations in the implant design process. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to use more complex biofidelic FEMs to assess prophylactic femoral augmentation methods.
老年人因侧向摔倒导致的股骨骨折与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。预防这些灾难性损伤的方法包括药物治疗,但疗效有限。预防性股骨增强系统是一种有前途的替代方法,通过解决最具破坏性的骨质疏松性骨折问题而受到关注。我们已经为尸体开发了一种新型侧向摔倒模拟器的有限元模型 (FEM)。由于标本和损伤结果的范围,这些 FEM 非常适合评估此类植入物。本研究的目的是使用 FEM 评估三种不同预防性股骨增强系统的机械有效性。Y 型支柱®(Hyprevention®,法国 Pessac)、伽玛钉®(Stryker,美国卡拉马祖)和简单的拉力螺钉股骨骨折植入物系统的模型被放置在嵌入软组织替代物的五个尸体骨盆-股骨结构的 FEM 中,然后在七个冲击速度下进行模拟侧向摔倒。还评估了仅股骨 FEM。检查了峰值冲击力和峰值髋臼力,并使用基于应变的标准评估了失效情况。我们发现,股骨增强系统增加了骨折前的峰值力,但对于严重冲击,无法防止骨折。在所有五个标本的摆锤跌落 FEM 和仅股骨模拟中,伽玛钉®系统相对于未增强的股骨始终产生最大的强度增加。在某些情况下,同一植入物似乎导致髋臼骨折。仅股骨 FEM 显示出比摆锤跌落模拟更大的力增加,这表明仅股骨模拟的结果可能不如软组织嵌入摆锤跌落模拟准确地代表侧向摔倒。本研究的结果证明了在计算环境中模拟高能现象和植入物效果的能力。结果还表明,植入物可以增加在撞击过程中施加到股骨近端的力。测试植入物的骨折结果可用于为未来设备的设计提供信息,这再次证实了在植入物设计过程中考虑生物逼真度进行建模的价值。据作者所知,这是第一篇使用更复杂的生物逼真 FEM 来评估预防性股骨增强方法的论文。