Ngqangashe Yandisa, Friel Sharon, Schram Ashley
Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Coombs Extension Building 8, Fellows Road, Australian National University, Acton, 2601Canberra, Australia.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec 7;25(5):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004730.
To identify the regulatory governance factors that lead to food policies achieving improvements in food environment, consumer behaviour and diet-related health outcomes.
Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was used to investigate the relationship between regulatory governance conditions and population nutrition outcomes. The regulatory governance conditions examined entailed: high industry involvement in the policy process, regulatory design, policy instrument design, policy monitoring and enforcement.
n 29 policy cases in the policy areas of food reformulation, nutrition labelling, food taxation and food marketing.
Policies implemented in thirteen countries.
Comprehensive monitoring was identified as a necessary regulatory governance condition for food policies to have an impact and was present in 94 % of policy cases that had a positive impact on nutrition outcomes. We identified two sufficient combinations of regulatory governance conditions. The first sufficient combination of conditions comprised an absence of high industry involvement in the policy process, combined with the presence of strict regulatory design, best-practice instrument design, and comprehensive monitoring and enforcement. Ninety-six percent of policy cases with positive impacts on nutrition outcomes displayed this combination. The second sufficient combination of conditions comprised an absensce of high industry involvement in the policy process, best practice instrument design and comprehensive monitoring. Eighty-two percent of policy cases with positive impacts on nutrition outcomes displayed this combination.
These findings show the importance of regulatory governance on policy outcomes. They suggest a need for more government-led nutrition policy processes and transparent monitoring systems that are independent from industry.
确定能使食品政策在改善食品环境、消费者行为和与饮食相关的健康结果方面取得成效的监管治理因素。
采用定性比较分析(QCA)来研究监管治理条件与人群营养结果之间的关系。所考察的监管治理条件包括:食品行业在政策制定过程中的高度参与、监管设计、政策工具设计、政策监测与执行。
食品配方改革、营养标签、食品征税和食品营销等政策领域的29个政策案例。
在13个国家实施的政策。
全面监测被确定为食品政策产生影响的必要监管治理条件,94% 对营养结果有积极影响的政策案例具备这一条件。我们确定了监管治理条件的两种充分组合。第一种充分组合条件包括食品行业在政策制定过程中没有高度参与,同时具备严格的监管设计、最佳实践工具设计以及全面的监测与执行。96% 对营养结果有积极影响的政策案例呈现出这种组合。第二种充分组合条件包括食品行业在政策制定过程中没有高度参与、最佳实践工具设计和全面监测。82% 对营养结果有积极影响的政策案例呈现出这种组合。
这些研究结果表明了监管治理对政策结果的重要性。它们表明需要更多由政府主导的营养政策制定过程以及独立于行业的透明监测系统。