School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK.
Institute of Physiologically Active Compounds Russian Academy of Sciences (IPAC RAS), 1 Severniy Proezd, Chernogolovk, 142432 Moscow, Russia.
Molecules. 2021 Dec 3;26(23):7351. doi: 10.3390/molecules26237351.
The accumulation of the various products of alpha-synuclein aggregation has been associated with the etiology and pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative conditions, including both familial and sporadic forms of Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). It is now well established that the aggregation and spread of alpha-synuclein aggregation pathology activate numerous pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to neurodegeneration and, ultimately, to disease progression. Therefore, the development of a safe and effective disease-modifying therapy that limits or prevents the accumulation of the toxic intermediate products of alpha-synuclein aggregation and the spread of alpha-synuclein aggregation pathology could provide significant positive clinical outcomes in PD/DLB cohorts. It has been suggested that this goal can be achieved by reducing the intracellular and/or extracellular levels of monomeric and already aggregated alpha-synuclein. The principal aim of this review is to critically evaluate the potential of therapeutic strategies that target the post-transcriptional steps of alpha-synuclein production and immunotherapy-based approaches to alpha-synuclein degradation in PD/DLB patients. Strategies aimed at the downregulation of alpha-synuclein production are at an early preclinical stage of drug development and, although they have shown promise in animal models of alpha-synuclein aggregation, many limitations need to be resolved before in-human clinical trials can be seriously considered. In contrast, many strategies aimed at the degradation of alpha-synuclein using immunotherapeutic approaches are at a more advanced stage of development, with some in-human Phase II clinical trials currently in progress. Translational barriers for both strategies include the limitations of alpha-synuclein aggregation models, poor understanding of the therapeutic window for the alpha-synuclein knockdown, and variability in alpha-synuclein pathology across patient cohorts. Overcoming such barriers should be the main focus of further studies. However, it is already clear that these strategies do have the potential to achieve a disease-modifying effect in PD and DLB.
α-突触核蛋白聚集的各种产物的积累与几种神经退行性疾病的病因和发病机制有关,包括家族性和散发性帕金森病(PD)和路易体痴呆(DLB)。现在已经确定,α-突触核蛋白聚集物的聚集和扩散激活了许多致病机制,这些机制导致神经退行性变,并最终导致疾病进展。因此,开发一种安全有效的疾病修饰疗法,限制或防止α-突触核蛋白聚集的毒性中间产物的积累和α-突触核蛋白聚集物的扩散,可以为 PD/DLB 患者提供显著的积极临床结果。有人认为,这一目标可以通过降低单体和已聚集的α-突触核蛋白的细胞内和/或细胞外水平来实现。本文的主要目的是批判性地评估针对α-突触核蛋白产生的转录后步骤的治疗策略和基于免疫疗法的α-突触核蛋白降解策略在 PD/DLB 患者中的潜力。旨在下调α-突触核蛋白产生的策略处于药物开发的早期临床前阶段,尽管它们在α-突触核蛋白聚集的动物模型中显示出了前景,但在考虑进行人体临床试验之前,还需要解决许多局限性。相比之下,许多旨在使用免疫治疗方法降解α-突触核蛋白的策略处于更先进的开发阶段,一些针对人体的 II 期临床试验目前正在进行中。这两种策略的转化障碍包括α-突触核蛋白聚集模型的局限性、对α-突触核蛋白敲低的治疗窗口的理解有限以及患者队列中α-突触核蛋白病理的变异性。克服这些障碍应该是进一步研究的主要重点。然而,很明显,这些策略确实有可能在 PD 和 DLB 中实现疾病修饰效果。