Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定在 ICU 镇静和老年心脏手术后患者术后恢复中的应用(DIRECT)。

Dexmedetomidine Use in Intensive Care Unit Sedation and Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients Post-Cardiac Surgery (DIRECT).

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Vancouver General and UBC Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Vancouver General and UBC Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Mar;36(3):880-892. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.024. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined recovery, delirium, and neurocognitive outcome in elderly patients receiving dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation after undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Open-label randomized trial.

SETTING

Single center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 70 patients older than 75 years without English language limitations and Mini Mental State Examination scores >20.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either propofol (group P) or dexmedetomidine (group D) postoperatively until normothermic and hemodynamically stable.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Quality of recovery (QoR) was measured by the QoR-40 questionnaire on postoperative day (POD) three. Secondary outcomes were incidence and duration of delirium, time to extubation, length of hospital stay, hospital mortality rate, postoperative quality of life (QoL; measured by SF-36 performed at baseline and six months postoperatively), and neurocognitive disorder (measured by Minnesota Cognitive Acuity Screen [MCAS] performed at baseline, POD5, and six months postoperatively). A total of sixty-seven patients completed the trial. There was no significant difference in QoR-40 scores (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.6081-to-10.9781; p = 1.000), incidence of delirium (group P, 42%; group D, 24%; p = 0.191), mean hospital stay (95% CI, -5.4838-to-1.5444; p = 0.297), mean time to extubation (95% CI, -19.2513-to-7.5561; p = 0.866), or mean duration of delirium (95% CI, -4.3065-to-1.067; p = 0.206) between groups. No patients died in the hospital. There were no significant differences in changes in SF-36 or MCAS scores over time between groups. There was a decline in MCAS score from preoperatively to POD5 in group P (95% CI, -8.95725-to- -2.61775; p = 0.0005), which was greater than that observed in group D.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' findings demonstrated that the use of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery was unlikely to improve QoR/postoperative QoL. Although the study was underpowered to detect secondary outcomes, the results suggested no reductions in delirium, time to extubation, and hospital stay, but a potential decrease in delayed neurocognitive recovery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨老年心脏手术后接受右美托咪定或丙泊酚镇静治疗的患者的恢复情况、谵妄和神经认知结局。

设计

开放性标签随机试验。

地点

单中心。

参与者

共纳入 70 名年龄大于 75 岁、无英语语言限制且简易精神状态检查评分>20 分的患者。

干预

患者术后接受丙泊酚(P 组)或右美托咪定(D 组)镇静,直至体温正常且血流动力学稳定。

测量和主要结果

术后第 3 天采用 QoR-40 问卷测量恢复质量(QoR)。次要结局包括谵妄的发生率和持续时间、拔管时间、住院时间、住院死亡率、术后生活质量(采用 SF-36 于基线和术后 6 个月进行测量)和神经认知障碍(采用明尼苏达认知能力筛查[MCAS]于基线、术后第 5 天和术后 6 个月进行测量)。共有 67 名患者完成了试验。两组患者 QoR-40 评分(95%置信区间[CI],-7.6081 至 10.9781;p=1.000)、谵妄发生率(P 组 42%;D 组 24%;p=0.191)、平均住院时间(95%CI,-5.4838 至 1.5444;p=0.297)、平均拔管时间(95%CI,-19.2513 至 7.5561;p=0.866)或谵妄持续时间(95%CI,-4.3065 至 1.067;p=0.206)均无显著差异。两组患者均无院内死亡。两组患者 SF-36 或 MCAS 评分随时间的变化均无显著差异。P 组患者的 MCAS 评分从术前到术后第 5 天下降(95%CI,-8.95725 至-2.61775;p=0.0005),降幅大于 D 组。

结论

作者的研究结果表明,与丙泊酚相比,老年心脏手术患者使用右美托咪定不太可能改善恢复质量/术后生活质量。尽管本研究的检测效力不足以检测次要结局,但结果提示谵妄、拔管时间和住院时间没有减少,但可能延迟了神经认知恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验