Holzinger Daniel, Weber Christoph, Barbaresi William, Beitel Christoph, Fellinger Johannes
Institute of Neurology of Senses and Language, Hospital of St. John of God, Linz, Austria.
Research Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 23;9:752141. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.752141. eCollection 2021.
The study was aimed at evaluating the validity and feasibility of SPES-3 (Sprachentwicklungsscreening), a language screening in 3-year-old children within the constraints of regular preventive medical check-ups. A four-component screening measure including parental reports on the child's expressive vocabulary and grammar based on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory and pediatrician-administered standardized assessments of noun plurals and sentence comprehension was used in a sample of 2,044 consecutively seen children in 30 pediatric offices. One-hundred forty-four children (70 who failed and 74 who passed the screener) comprised the validation sample and also underwent follow-up gold standard assessment. To avoid verification and spectrum bias multiple imputation of missing diagnosis for children who did not undergo gold standard assessment was used. Independent diagnoses by two experts blinded to the screening results were considered gold standard for diagnosing language disorder. Screening accuracy of each of the four subscales was analyzed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Feasibility was assessed by use of a questionnaire completed by the pediatricians. The two parental screening subscales demonstrated excellent accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) scores of 0.910 and 0.908 whereas AUC scores were significantly lower for the subscales directly administered by the pediatricians (0.816 and 0.705). A composite score based on both parental screening scales (AUC = 0.946) outperformed single subscales. A cut off of 41.69 on a -scale resulted in about 20% positive screens and showed good sensitivity (0.878) and specificity (0.876). Practicability, acceptability and sustainability of the screening measure were mostly rated as high. The parent-reported subscales of the SPES-3 language screener are a promising screening tool for use in primary pediatric care settings.
本研究旨在评估SPES - 3(语言发展筛查)在常规预防性体检的限制条件下,对3岁儿童进行语言筛查的有效性和可行性。在30个儿科诊所连续就诊的2044名儿童样本中,使用了一种由四部分组成的筛查方法,包括基于麦克阿瑟交流发展量表的家长对孩子表达性词汇和语法的报告,以及儿科医生进行的名词复数和句子理解的标准化评估。144名儿童(70名筛查未通过者和74名通过者)组成了验证样本,并接受了后续的金标准评估。为避免验证和频谱偏差,对未接受金标准评估的儿童使用多重填补法处理缺失诊断。由两名对筛查结果不知情的专家进行的独立诊断被视为诊断语言障碍的金标准。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析四个子量表各自的筛查准确性。通过儿科医生填写的问卷评估可行性。两个家长筛查子量表显示出优异的准确性,曲线下面积(AUC)得分分别为0.910和0.908,而儿科医生直接实施的子量表的AUC得分则显著较低(0.816和0.705)。基于两个家长筛查量表的综合得分(AUC = 0.946)优于单个子量表。在 -量表上,41.69的截断值导致约20%的阳性筛查结果,且显示出良好的敏感性(0.878)和特异性(0.876)。筛查方法的实用性、可接受性和可持续性大多被评为较高。SPES - 3语言筛查器中家长报告的子量表是用于初级儿科护理环境的一种有前景的筛查工具。